首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Self-reported and routinely collected electronic healthcare resource-use data for trial-based economic evaluations: the current state of play in England and considerations for the future
【2h】

Self-reported and routinely collected electronic healthcare resource-use data for trial-based economic evaluations: the current state of play in England and considerations for the future

机译:自我报告并定期收集电子医疗资源使用数据以进行基于试验的经济评估:英格兰的现状和对未来的考虑

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are generally regarded as the “gold standard” for providing quantifiable evidence around the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new healthcare technologies. In order to perform the economic evaluations associated with RCTs, there is a need for accessible and good quality resource-use data; for the purpose of discussion here, data that best reflect the care received.Traditionally, researchers have developed questionnaires for resource-use data collection. However, the evolution of routinely collected electronic data within care services provides new opportunities for collecting data without burdening patients or caregivers (e.g. clinicians). This paper describes the potential strengths and limitations of each data collection method and then discusses aspects for consideration before choosing which method to use.
机译:背景随机对照试验(RCT)通常被视为提供有关新医疗技术有效性和成本效益的可量化证据的“黄金标准”。为了进行与RCT相关的经济评估,需要可访问的高质量资源使用数据;为了此处的讨论目的,数据最能反映所接受的护理。传统上,研究人员已经开发了用于资源使用数据收集的问卷。但是,护理服务中常规收集的电子数据的发展为收集数据提供了新的机会,而又不会给患者或护理人员(例如临床医生)带来负担。本文介绍了每种数据收集方法的潜在优势和局限性,然后讨论了在选择使用哪种方法之前需要考虑的方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号