首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development
【2h】

Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development

机译:在定性研究数据的主题分析中尝试严格和可复制;代码本开发案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundNavigating the world of qualitative thematic analysis can be challenging. This is compounded by the fact that detailed descriptions of methods are often omitted from qualitative discussions. While qualitative research methodologies are now mature, there often remains a lack of fine detail in their description both at submitted peer reviewed article level and in textbooks. As one of research’s aims is to determine the relationship between knowledge and practice through the demonstration of rigour, more detailed descriptions of methods could prove useful. Rigour in quantitative research is often determined through detailed explanation allowing replication, but the ability to replicate is often not considered appropriate in qualitative research. However, a well described qualitative methodology could demonstrate and ensure the same effect.
机译:背景技术对定性主题分析的世界进行导航可能具有挑战性。由于定性讨论经常省略对方法的详细描述,这一事实使情况更加复杂。虽然定性研究方法已经很成熟,但是在提交的同行评审文章级别和教科书中,在描述方面通常都缺乏足够的细节。由于研究的目的之一是通过证明严谨性来确定知识与实践之间的关系,因此对方法进行更详细的描述可能很有用。定量研究中的严谨性通常是通过允许复制的详细解释来确定的,但是在定性研究中复制能力常常被认为不适当。但是,描述良好的定性方法论可以证明并确保同样的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号