首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Nephrology >Reiki and related therapies in the dialysis ward: an evidence-based and ethical discussion to debate if these complementary and alternative medicines are welcomed or banned
【2h】

Reiki and related therapies in the dialysis ward: an evidence-based and ethical discussion to debate if these complementary and alternative medicines are welcomed or banned

机译:透析病房中的灵气和相关疗法:基于证据的道德讨论以讨论是否欢迎或禁止使用这些补充性和替代性药物

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundComplementary and Alternative Medicines (CAMs) are increasingly practiced in the general population; it is estimated that over 30% of patients with chronic diseases use CAMs on a regular basis. CAMs are also used in hospital settings, suggesting a growing interest in individualized therapies. One potential field of interest is pain, frequently reported by dialysis patients, and seldom sufficiently relieved by mainstream therapies. Gentle-touch therapies and Reiki (an energy based touch therapy) are widely used in the western population as pain relievers.By integrating evidence based approaches and providing ethical discussion, this debate discusses the pros and cons of CAMs in the dialysis ward, and whether such approaches should be welcomed or banned.
机译:背景普通人群中越来越多地使用补充和替代药物(CAMs)。据估计,超过30%的慢性病患者定期使用CAM。 CAM也用于医院,这表明人们对个体化治疗的兴趣与日俱增。潜在的兴趣领域之一是疼痛,透析患者经常报告疼痛,而主流疗法很少能充分缓解疼痛。轻柔疗法和灵气疗法(能量疗法)在西方人群中广泛用作止痛药。通过整合基于证据的方法并进行道德讨论,本次辩论讨论了透析病房中CAM的利弊,以及应该欢迎或禁止这种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号