首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Ophthalmology >Comparing the effectiveness and costs of Bevacizumab to Ranibizumab in patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: a randomized clinical trial (the BRDME study)
【2h】

Comparing the effectiveness and costs of Bevacizumab to Ranibizumab in patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: a randomized clinical trial (the BRDME study)

机译:比较贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗在糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者中的有效性和费用:一项随机临床试验(BRDME研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe effectiveness of ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema has been proven with large clinical trials. For bevacizumab only two clinical trials have been published and a head-to-head comparison is lacking to date. However, if proved non-inferior to ranibizumab, use of the off-label bevacizumab could reduce costs enormously without a loss in visual acuity. A cost-effectiveness study has been designed to substantiate this hypothesis.
机译:背景技术兰尼单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的有效性已通过大量临床试验证明。对于贝伐单抗,仅发表了两项临床试验,迄今为止尚无直接比较。但是,如果证明不劣于兰尼单抗,则使用标签外的贝伐单抗可以在不降低视力的情况下极大地降低成本。已经设计了一项成本效益研究来证实这一假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号