首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Palliative Care >Adding a second surprise question triggers general practitioners to increase the thoroughness of palliative care planning: results of a pilot RCT with cage vignettes
【2h】

Adding a second surprise question triggers general practitioners to increase the thoroughness of palliative care planning: results of a pilot RCT with cage vignettes

机译:添加第二个令人惊讶的问题会触发全科医生提高姑息治疗计划的彻底性:带有笼子小插曲的随机对照试验的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn our aging society, palliative care should be a standard component of health care. However, currently it is only provided to a small proportion of patients, mostly to those with cancer, and restricted to the terminal phase. Many general practitioners (GPs) say that one of their most significant challenges is to assess the right moment to start anticipatory palliative care. The “Surprise Question” (SQ1: “Would I be surprised if this patient were to die in the next 12 months”?), if answered with “no”, is an easy tool to apply in identifying patients in need of palliative care. However, this tool has a low specificity. Therefore, the aim of our pilot study was to determine if adding a second, more specific “Surprise Question” (SQ2: “Would I be surprised if this patient is still alive after 12 months”?) in case SQ1 is answered in the negative, prompts GPs to plan for anticipatory palliative care.
机译:背景技术在我们的老龄化社会中,姑息治疗应成为医疗保健的标准组成部分。但是,目前仅向一小部分患者提供此服务,大部分是癌症患者,并且仅限于晚期。许多全科医生(GPs)表示,他们最重大的挑战之一是评估开始进行预期性姑息治疗的恰当时机。如果回答“否”,则“惊喜问题”(SQ1:“如果该患者在接下来的12个月内死亡”,我会感到惊讶吗?)是用于识别需要姑息治疗的患者的简便工具。但是,该工具的特异性较低。因此,我们的初步研究的目的是确定是否添加第二个更具体的“惊奇问题”(SQ2:“如果该患者在12个月后还活着,我会感到惊讶吗?”) ,提示全科医生计划进行预期的姑息治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号