首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Evidence of overuse? Patterns of obstetric interventions during labour and birth among Australian mothers
【2h】

Evidence of overuse? Patterns of obstetric interventions during labour and birth among Australian mothers

机译:有过度使用的证据吗?澳大利亚母亲在分娩过程中的产科干预方式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThere is global concern for the overuse of obstetric interventions during labour and birth. Of particular concern is the increasing amount of mothers and babies experiencing morbidity and mortality associated with caesarean section compared to vaginal birth. In high-income settings, emerging evidence suggests that overuse of obstetric intervention is more prevalent among wealthier mothers with no medical need of it. In Australia, the rates of caesarean section and other obstetric interventions are rising. These rising rates of intervention have been mirrored by a decreasing rate of unassisted non-instrumental vaginal deliveries. In the context of rising global concern about rising caesarean section rates and the known health effects of caesarean section on mothers and children, we aim to better characterise the use of obstetric intervention in the state of Queensland, Australia by examining the characteristics of mothers receiving obstetric intervention. Identifying whether there is overuse of obstetric interventions within a population is critical to improving the quality, value and appropriateness of maternity care.
机译:背景技术全球关注的是在分娩和分娩期间过度使用产科干预措施。与阴道分娩相比,剖宫产相关的发病率和死亡率越来越高,这是特别令人关注的母亲和婴儿数量。在高收入地区,越来越多的证据表明,在没有医疗需要的较富裕的母亲中,过度使用产科干预更为普遍。在澳大利亚,剖腹产和其他产科干预的比例正在上升。无辅助的非器械性阴道分娩率的下降反映了这些干预率的上升。在全球范围内越来越关注剖腹产率上升以及剖宫产对母亲和儿童的健康影响的关注下,我们旨在通过检查接受产科母亲的特征来更好地表征澳大利亚昆士兰州的产科干预措施介入。确定人群中是否过度使用产科干预措施对于提高产妇保健的质量,价值和适当性至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号