首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Psychiatry >The structure of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder amongst West Papuan refugees
【2h】

The structure of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder amongst West Papuan refugees

机译:西巴布亚难民的创伤后应激障碍和复杂的创伤后应激障碍的结构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe validity of applying the construct of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) across cultures has been the subject of contention. Although PTSD symptoms have been identified across multiple cultures, questions remain whether the constellation represents a coherent construct with an interpretable factor structure across diverse populations, especially those naïve to western notions of mental disorder. An important additional question is whether a constellation of Complex-PTSD (C-PTSD) can be identified and if so, whether there are distinctions between that disorder and core PTSD in patterns of antecedent traumatic events. Our study amongst West Papuan refugees in Papua New Guinea (PNG) aimed to examine the factorial structure of PTSD based on the DSM-IV, DSM-5, ICD-10 and ICD-11 definitions, and C-PTSD according to proposed ICD-11 criteria. We also investigated domains of traumatic events (TEs) and broader psychosocial effects of conflict (sense of safety and injustice) associated with the factorial structures identified.
机译:背景跨文化应用创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)构建体的有效性一直是争论的主题。尽管已经在多种文化中发现了PTSD症状,但仍然存在疑问,即星座是否代表了一个可解释的因素结构,并且在不同人群中,尤其是对西方精神病天真的人们而言,其结构是可解释的。一个重要的附加问题是,是否可以识别出复杂的PTSD(C-PTSD)星座,如果可以,在先前的创伤事件模式中,该障碍与核心PTSD是否存在区别。我们在巴布亚新几内亚(PNG)的西巴布亚难民中进行的研究旨在根据DSM-IV,DSM-5,ICD-10和ICD-11定义检查PTSD的阶乘结构,并根据建议的ICD-C检查C-PTSD 11条标准。我们还调查了创伤事件(TEs)的领域以及与确定的因子结构相关的冲突的更广泛的社会心理影响(安全感和不公正感)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号