首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Royal Society Interface >Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on a novel probabilistic rupture risk index
【2h】

Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on a novel probabilistic rupture risk index

机译:基于新型概率破裂风险指数的腹主动脉瘤生物力学破裂风险评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A rupture risk assessment is critical to the clinical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients. The biomechanical AAA rupture risk assessment quantitatively integrates many known AAA rupture risk factors but the variability of risk predictions due to model input uncertainties remains a challenging limitation. This study derives a probabilistic rupture risk index (PRRI). Specifically, the uncertainties in AAA wall thickness and wall strength were considered, and wall stress was predicted with a state-of-the-art deterministic biomechanical model. The discriminative power of PRRI was tested in a diameter-matched cohort of ruptured (n = 7) and intact (n = 7) AAAs and compared to alternative risk assessment methods. Computed PRRI at 1.5 mean arterial pressure was significantly (p = 0.041) higher in ruptured AAAs (20.21(s.d. 14.15%)) than in intact AAAs (3.71(s.d. 5.77)%). PRRI showed a high sensitivity and specificity (discriminative power of 0.837) to discriminate between ruptured and intact AAA cases. The underlying statistical representation of stochastic data of wall thickness, wall strength and peak wall stress had only negligible effects on PRRI computations. Uncertainties in AAA wall stress predictions, the wide range of reported wall strength and the stochastic nature of failure motivate a probabilistic rupture risk assessment. Advanced AAA biomechanical modelling paired with a probabilistic rupture index definition as known from engineering risk assessment seems to be superior to a purely deterministic approach.
机译:破裂风险评估对于腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者的临床治疗至关重要。生物力学AAA破裂风险评估定量地集成了许多已知的AAA破裂风险因素,但是由于模型输入不确定性导致的风险预测的可变性仍然是一个具有挑战性的局限性。这项研究得出概率破裂风险指数(PRRI)。具体而言,考虑了AAA壁厚和壁强度的不确定性,并使用最新的确定性生物力学模型预测壁应力。在直径匹配的破裂(n = 7)和完整(n = 7)AAA队列中测试了PRRI的判别力,并与其他风险评估方法进行了比较。破裂的AAAs(20.21(s.d。14.15%))的平均动脉压为1.5时,计算出的PRRI显着高于完整AAAs(3.71(s.d.5.77)%)(p = 0.041)。 PRRI显示出较高的敏感性和特异性(判别力为0.837),可区分破裂性和完整AAA病例。壁厚,壁强度和峰值壁应力随机数据的基本统计表示对PRRI计算的影响可忽略不计。 AAA壁应力预测的不确定性,所报道的壁强度的广泛范围以及失效的随机性激发了概率破裂风险评估。从工程风险评估中得知,先进的AAA生物力学建模与概率破裂指数定义相结合似乎优于纯确定性方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号