首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Ethics >An empirical study of the ‘underscreened’ in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates
【2h】

An empirical study of the ‘underscreened’ in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates

机译:对有组织的宫颈癌筛查中筛查不足的实证研究:专家专注于增加机会以减少筛查率差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundCervical cancer disproportionately burdens disadvantaged women. Organised cervical screening aims to make cancer prevention available to all women in a population, yet screening uptake and cancer incidence and mortality are strongly correlated with socioeconomic status (SES). Reaching underscreened populations is a stated priority in many screening programs, usually with an emphasis on something like ‘equity’. Equity is a poorly defined and understood concept. We aimed to explain experts’ perspectives on how cervical screening programs might justifiably respond to ‘the underscreened’.
机译:背景宫颈癌给处境不利的妇女带来了不成比例的负担。有组织的宫颈癌筛查旨在使人群中的所有妇女都能进行癌症预防,但是筛查的摄取以及癌症的发病率和死亡率与社会经济地位(SES)密切相关。在许多筛查计划中,要达到筛查不足的人群是优先考虑的事情,通常重点是“平等”。公平是一个定义不清,理解不清的概念。我们旨在解释专家们对宫颈筛查计划如何合理地应对“筛查不足”的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号