首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >006 OP: RESEARCHING HEALTH AND WELFARE IN SUPERDIVERSE NEIGHBOURHOODS: REFLECTIONS ON USING A COMMUNITY RESEARCH MODEL IN UPPSALA SWEDEN
【2h】

006 OP: RESEARCHING HEALTH AND WELFARE IN SUPERDIVERSE NEIGHBOURHOODS: REFLECTIONS ON USING A COMMUNITY RESEARCH MODEL IN UPPSALA SWEDEN

机译:006 OP:研究超级多样性邻里居民的健康和福利:对在瑞典乌普萨拉使用社区研究模型的思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A community research model developed in the UK was adopted in a multi-country interdisciplinary study of health and welfare in superdiverse neighbourhoods. The model involves training a diverse group of community members in qualitative research methods, and engaging them in research in their own community. In Uppsala, Sweden, five community researchers were recruited to facilitate access to diverse groups in the two study neighbourhoods, including ethnic, religious, and linguistic minorities.After training, community researchers recruited study participants from the study neighbourhoods, and assisted during interviews. Their local networks, and knowledge about the neighbourhoods were invaluable for contextualising the study and finding participants. However, they were not able to recruit participants from certain groups due to language barriers, and it was difficult to retain community researchers in the project. The study took place in the context of an unprecedented number of asylum-seekers arriving in Sweden, which took up many collaborators' time.Various contextual factors made it difficult to fully apply this particular model of community research in the Swedish setting. Employing several people on short-term contracts is complicated as Swedish Universities are public authorities. Other aspects of Swedish culture and the labour market, such as strong expectations of stable full-time employment, make flexible part-time work undesirable.The community research model was only partly successful in embedding the research project as a collaboration between community members and the University. While there was interest and some short-term involvement from residents of study neighbourhoods, the research remained University-led with limited sense of community ownership.
机译:在英国建立的一种社区研究模型被用于多民族社区健康与福利的多学科跨学科研究。该模型涉及对各种社区成员进行定性研究方法方面的培训,并使他们参与自己社区中的研究。在瑞典的乌普萨拉(Uppsala),招募了五名社区研究人员,以方便进入两个研究社区的不同群体,包括族裔,宗教和语言上的少数民族。培训后,社区研究人员从研究社区招募了研究参与者,并在访谈中提供了帮助。他们的本地网络以及有关邻里的知识对于研究的情境化和寻找参与者非常宝贵。但是,由于语言障碍,他们无法从某些群体招募参与者,并且很难将社区研究人员留在该项目中。这项研究是在空前的寻求庇护者抵达瑞典的背景下进行的,这占用了许多合作者的时间。各种背景因素使得难以在瑞典环境中充分应用这种特殊的社区研究模型。由于瑞典大学是政府机构,因此以短期合同雇用数个人非常复杂。瑞典文化和劳动力市场的其他方面,例如对稳定的全职工作的强烈期望,使得灵活的兼职工作变得不可取。社区研究模型仅部分成功地将研究项目嵌入了社区成员与社区之间的合作。大学。尽管研究社区的居民对此表示兴趣并进行了短期参与,但该研究仍由大学主导,社区归属感有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号