首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines
【2h】

Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines

机译:使用非随机设计(TREND)报告准则评估透明评估报告的影响和使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionAccurate and full reporting of evaluation of interventions in health research is needed for evidence synthesis and informed decision-making. Evidence suggests that biases and incomplete reporting affect the assessment of study validity and the ability to include this data in secondary research. The Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guideline was developed to improve the transparency and accuracy of the reporting of behavioural and public health evaluations with non-randomised designs. Evaluations of reporting guidelines have shown that they can be effective in improving reporting completeness. Although TREND occupies a niche within reporting guidelines, and despite it being 8 years since publication, no study yet has assessed its impact on reporting completeness or investigated what factors affect its use by authors and journal editors. This protocol describes two studies that aim to redress this.
机译:引言为了综合证据和做出明智的决策,需要对健康研究干预措施的评估进行准确,完整的报告。有证据表明,偏见和不完整的报告会影响研究有效性的评估以及将这些数据包括在二级研究中的能力。制定了非随机设计评估透明报告(TREND)报告指南,以提高非随机设计评估行为和公共卫生评估报告的透明度和准确性。对报告准则的评估表明,它们可以有效地改善报告的完整性。尽管TREND在报告指南中占有一席之地,尽管距出版已8年之久,但尚无研究评估其对报告完整性的影响,也未调查影响作者和期刊编辑使用该报告的因素。该协议描述了旨在解决此问题的两项研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号