首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >In vitro testing of chemotherapeutic drug combinations in acute myelocytic leukaemia using the fluorometric microculture cytotoxicity assay (FMCA).
【2h】

In vitro testing of chemotherapeutic drug combinations in acute myelocytic leukaemia using the fluorometric microculture cytotoxicity assay (FMCA).

机译:使用荧光微培养细胞毒性测定法(FMCA)对急性粒细胞白血病的化学治疗药物组合进行体外测试。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The fluorometric microculture cytotoxicity assay (FMCA) was employed for analysing the effect of different chemotherapeutic drug combinations and their single constituents in 44 cases of acute myelocytic leukaemia (AML). A large heterogeneity with respect to cell kill was observed for all combinations tested, the interactions ranging from antagonistic to synergistic in terms of the multiplicative concept for drug interactions. However, an 'additive' model provided a significantly better fit of the data compared to the effect of the most active single agent of the combination (Dmax) for several common antileukaemic drug combinations. When the two interaction models were related to treatment outcome 38% of the non-responders showed preference for the additive model whereas the corresponding figure for responders was 80%. Overall, in 248 of 290 (85%) tests performed with drug combinations, there was an agreement between the effect of the combination and that of the most active single component. Direct comparison of Dmax and the combination for correlation with clinical outcome demonstrated only minor differences in the ability to predict drug resistance. The results show that FMCA appear to report drug interactions in samples from patients with AML in accordance with clinical experience. Furthermore, testing single agents as a substitute for drug combinations may be adequate for detection of clinical drug resistance to combination therapy in AML.
机译:荧光微培养细胞毒性测定法(FMCA)用于分析44种急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)中不同化学治疗药物组合及其单一成分的作用。对于所有测试的组合,在细胞杀灭方面观察到很大的异质性,就药物相互作用的乘性概念而言,相互作用的范围从拮抗作用到协同作用。但是,对于几种常见的抗白血病药物组合,与组合中最具活性的单一药物(Dmax)的效果相比,“相加”模型可提供更好的数据拟合性。当两种相互作用模型与治疗结果相关时,38%的无反应者显示出对加性模型的偏爱,而有反应者的相应数字为80%。总体而言,在用药物组合进行的290项试验中有248项(占85%),在组合的作用与最具活性的单一成分的作用之间达成了共识。 Dmax及其组合与临床结果的相关性的直接比较表明,预测耐药性的能力仅有微小差异。结果表明,根据临床经验,FMCA似乎报告了AML患者样品中的药物相互作用。此外,测试单一药物以替代药物组合可能足以检测AML对组合疗法的临床耐药性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号