首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy.
【2h】

Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy.

机译:预测淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的结局:流式细胞仪和细胞图像分析对DNA倍性测定的价值的比较研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study was aimed at determining whether tumour DNA content measured by cell image analysis could provide additional prognostic information when compared to that provided by flow cytometry. Sections cut from paraffin blocks of tumours from 101 patients with node negative breast cancer were analysed by both methods and the results related to other prognostic variables and to patient relapse and overall survival. DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry classified 46 tumours as diploid and 55 as aneuploid, whereas by cell image analysis 30 were diploid and 71 aneuploid (P less than 0.002). There were 20 tumours with discrepancies between the two methods; 18 of these were tumours with only one peak in flow analysis, but determined to be aneuploid with image analysis. DNA content as measured by both methods was significant for predicting relapse and survival by log-rank test, as were tumour histological grade, c-erbB-2 expression and tumour size. Multivariate analysis showed DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry to be the only variable of independent significance (P less than 0.02) for both relapse and overall survival. Compared with cell image analysis, flow cytometry demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of diploid tumours, which may be related to differences in the internal standards applied to each method. We suggest that cell image analysis techniques can provide more sensitive information on the DNA content of tumour cells by direct measurement of nuclear DNA density of both normal lymphocytes and tumour cells in the same section. However, although image analysis appears to be more sensitive than flow cytometry in detecting DNA aneuploidy, the image technique appears to lack the specificity of flow cytometry in correlation with clinical outcome.
机译:这项研究旨在确定与流式细胞术相比,通过细胞图像分析测量的肿瘤DNA含量是否可以提供其他预后信息。通过两种方法分析了101例淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤石蜡切片,结果与其他预后变量以及患者复发和总体生存率相关。通过流式细胞仪测量的DNA倍性将46个肿瘤分类为二倍体,将55个肿瘤分类为非整倍体,而通过细胞图像分析,将30个分类为二倍体和71个非整倍体(P小于0.002)。两种方法之间有20个肿瘤存在差异。这些肿瘤中有18种在血流分析中只有一个峰,但经图像分析确定为非整倍体。两种方法测量的DNA含量通过对数秩检验对预测复发和生存具有重要意义,肿瘤组织学分级,c-erbB-2表达和肿瘤大小也很重要。多变量分析显示,通过流式细胞仪检测的DNA倍性是复发和总体生存率具有独立显着性的唯一变量(P小于0.02)。与细胞图像分析相比,流式细胞仪显示出更高的二倍体肿瘤比例,这可能与每种方法所用内标的差异有关。我们建议,通过直接测量同一部分中正常淋巴细胞和肿瘤细胞的核DNA密度,细胞图像分析技术可以提供有关肿瘤细胞DNA含量的更敏感信息。然而,尽管在检测DNA非整倍性方面,图像分析似乎比流式细胞仪更灵敏,但是图像技术似乎缺乏与临床结果相关的流式细胞仪的特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号