首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >Comparison of four serum tumour markers in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma.
【2h】

Comparison of four serum tumour markers in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma.

机译:四种血清肿瘤标志物在大肠癌诊断中的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The assessment of the diagnostic power of four serum tumour markers, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 50 and CA 195 for colorectal carcinoma is described, according to recently formulated guidelines. Preoperative serum concentrations of the four markers were determined in 198 colorectal cancer patients and 57 patients with a benign colorectal disorder. The cumulative frequency distributions of the malignant and benign group show strong overlap for all markers, which indicates low diagnostic ability. This is confirmed by the Receiver Operating Characteristic curves, which have areas under the curve of 0.65 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.73) for CA 19-9, CA 50 and CA 195 and of 0.70 (95%) CI 0.63-0.77) for CEA. The new tumour markers appear to be of slightly less diagnostic value than CEA for the primary diagnosis of colorectal cancer, although the discrepancy is not statistically significant. The low diagnostic power of CA 19-9, CA 50 and CA 195 may be due to a high proportion of colorectal cancer patients having the Lewis(a-b-) phenotype, who cannot synthesise these markers.
机译:根据最近制定的指南,描述了四种血清肿瘤标志物CEA,CA 19-9,CA 50和CA 195对结直肠癌的诊断能力的评估。在198例大肠癌患者和57例良性大肠疾病患者中确定了这四种标志物的术前血清浓度。恶性和良性组的累积频率分布对所有标记物显示出强烈的重叠,这表明诊断能力低。接收器工作特性曲线证实了这一点,对于CA 19-9,CA 50和CA 195,曲线下的面积分别为0.65(95%置信区间(CI)0.58-0.73)和0.70(95%)CI 0.63 -0.77)。尽管差异在统计学上并不显着,但对于大肠癌的初步诊断,新的肿瘤标志物似乎比CEA的诊断价值略低。 CA 19-9,CA 50和CA 195的诊断能力低可能是由于具有Lewis(a-b-)表型的结直肠癌患者比例较高,无法合成这些标记。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号