首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Diagnostic anterior chamber paracentesis in uveitis: a safe procedure?
【2h】

Diagnostic anterior chamber paracentesis in uveitis: a safe procedure?

机译:葡萄膜炎的诊断性前房穿刺术:安全程序吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND—Differentiation between infectious and non-infectious uveitis is of crucial value for accurate management of patients with uveitis. Tests performed on aqueous humour yield more relevant information than those done in serum. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the aqueous humour tap for diagnostic purposes is a safe procedure to perform in uveitis patients.
METHODS—In this retrospective study 361 patients with uveitis, who underwent a diagnostic anterior chamber paracentesis in an outpatient clinic, were investigated. 72 of the 361 patients were examined 30 minutes after the puncture. The site of the paracentesis, the depth of the anterior chamber, and cells in the anterior chamber were examined. All 361 patients were evaluated within 2 weeks after the paracentesis was performed. The final follow up period varied from 6 months to more than 3 years. The clinical data were analysed with the emphasis on the occurrence of cataract and a history of corneal infections or endophthalmitis.
RESULTS—In this series no serious side effects such as cataract, keratitis, or endophthalmitis were observed. The depth of the anterior chamber of all evaluated patients was restored after 30 minutes. In five out of 72 cases (three AIDS patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis and two patients with anterior uveitis due to herpes simplex virus) a small hyphaema was observed 30 minutes after the paracentesis took place.
CONCLUSION—Anterior chamber paracentesis appears to be a safe procedure in the hands of an experienced ophthalmologist.

机译:背景技术感染性和非感染性葡萄膜炎之间的区别对于准确管理葡萄膜炎患者具有至关重要的价值。与在血清中进行的测试相比,对房水进行的测试可获得更多的相关信息。这项研究的目的是评估用于诊断目的的房水水龙头是否是在葡萄膜炎患者中进行的安全手术。
方法-在这项回顾性研究中,有361例葡萄膜炎患者接受了诊断性前房穿刺术门诊,进行了调查。穿刺后30分钟检查了361名患者中的72名。检查穿刺部位,前房深度和前房细胞。进行穿刺穿刺术后2周内对所有361例患者进行了评估。最后的随访期从6个月到3年以上不等。对临床数据进行了分析,重点是白内障的发生以及角膜感染或眼内炎的病史。
结果—在该系列中,未观察到严重的副作用,例如白内障,角膜炎或眼内炎。 30分钟后恢复所有评估患者的前房深度。在72例病例中,有5例(3名AIDS患者患有巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎,2例因单纯疱疹病毒引起的前葡萄膜炎患者)在穿刺穿刺术发生30分钟后观察到小菌丝。
结论—前房穿刺术似乎是由经验丰富的眼科医生进行的安全操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号