首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)
【2h】

Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)

机译:比较多焦点和单焦点人工晶状体的光学性能(对比敏感度和动态视敏度)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The functional results (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity) of 19 multifocal (3M design) and 14 all polymethylmethacrylate biconvex monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), 6 mm in optical diameter were compared. Best corrected visual acuity was > or = 8/10 (Monoyer chart) Parinaud 2 in all cases. Major differences of functional performance in favour of monofocal IOLs were found outside standard conditions of vision (low contrast and illumination levels). A significant difference in contrast sensitivity was found for each spatial frequency in favour of multifocal IOLs (0.0016 < p < 0.05). Mesopic vision was statistically higher in the monofocal IOL group (p = 0.0015). Moreover, dynamic visual acuity allowed accurate evaluation of the difference in performance between these two models of implant. In view of these results multifocal IOLs should be reserved for patients with normal psychosensitive adaptation; an ocular pathology that could alter contrast sensitivity or mesopic vision is a contraindication for multifocal IOLs.
机译:比较了19个多焦点(3M设计)和14个全聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯双凸单焦点人工晶状体(IOLs),光学直径为6毫米的功能结果(对比度灵敏度和动态视敏度)。在所有情况下,最佳矫正视力均大于或等于8/10(Monoyer图)Parinaud 2。在标准视觉条件(低对比度和照明水平)之外,发现了支持单焦点IOL的功能性能的主要差异。发现每个空间频率的对比敏感度存在显着差异,有利于多焦点IOL(0.0016 <0.05)。单焦点IOL组的中视视力在统计学上较高(p = 0.0015)。此外,动态视敏度可以准确评估这两种植入物模型之间的性能差异。鉴于这些结果,多焦点人工晶状体应保留给心理适应能力正常的患者。可能改变对比敏感度或中视视觉的眼科病理学是多焦点人工晶体的禁忌症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号