首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Regional anaesthesia for cataract surgery: comparison of three techniques.
【2h】

Regional anaesthesia for cataract surgery: comparison of three techniques.

机译:白内障手术的区域麻醉:三种技术的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two methods of periocular anaesthesia (PI and PII) were compared with the traditional retrobulbar block in a prospective study of 450 patients undergoing elective cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. A solution of local anaesthetic containing equal amounts of 2% lignocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine was used in all the groups. Hyaluronidase (75 IU/10 ml of local anaesthetic solution) was added. Three groups of patients were studied, with 150 patients in each group. The retrobulbar injection (group R) was performed with 4 ml of the anaesthetic solution through the lower eyelid inferotemporally and a further 6 ml was injected for seventh cranial nerve block. In the first periocular technique (group PI) the local anaesthetic was injected inferotemporally (5 ml) through the lower lid and superonasally (5 ml) through the upper lid. In the second periocular technique (PII) the injections were performed inferotemporally (5 ml) and into the medial compartment (2 ml) of the orbit at the medial canthus. Satisfactory anaesthesia could be achieved with all of these methods. Additional block because of insufficient akinesia of the muscles was required in 12% (18/150) in group R, in 19% (28/150) in group PI, and in 11% (16/150) in PII. The medial compartment technique (PII) was associated with the highest percentage of total akinesia of the muscles and lowest reblock rate. All three methods produced sufficient analgesia during surgery and there were no differences in the requirements for additional analgesic drugs during surgery. It is concluded that the medial compartment technique represents a good alternative to retrobulbar block.
机译:在一项针对450名接受选择性白内障摘除和人工晶状体植入术的患者的前瞻性研究中,比较了两种眼周麻醉方法(PI和PII)与传统的眼球后阻滞的比较。在所有组中均使用了包含等量的2%利多卡因和0.5%布比卡因的局麻药溶液。加入透明质酸酶(75 IU / 10 ml局麻药)。研究了三组患者,每组150位患者。眼球后注射(R组)的方法是从下眼睑通过下眼睑注入4毫升麻醉药,然后再注入6毫升麻醉药以治疗第七颅神经阻滞。在第一种眼周技术(PI组)中,局部麻醉剂是通过下眼睑下腔注射(5毫升),并通过上眼睑经鼻腔注射(5毫升)。在第二种眼周技术(PII)中,注射是在颞下肌(5 ml)进行,并在can的内侧眼眶(2 ml)进行。使用所有这些方法都可以达到满意的麻醉效果。 R组中12%(18/150),PI组中19%(28/150)和PII中11%(16/150)由于肌肉运动不足而需要额外的阻滞。内侧隔室技术(PII)与最高的肌肉总运动能力百分比和最低的阻滞率相关。三种方法在手术过程中都能产生足够的镇痛效果,并且在手术期间对其他镇痛药的需求没有差异。结论是内侧隔室技术是球后阻滞的良好替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号