首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >A study of the clinical efficacy of azelastine in patients with extrinsic asthma and its effect on airway responsiveness.
【2h】

A study of the clinical efficacy of azelastine in patients with extrinsic asthma and its effect on airway responsiveness.

机译:氮卓斯汀在外源性哮喘患者中的临床疗效及其对气道反应性的影响的研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

1. The effect of 4.4 mg azelastine administered orally on airway responsiveness, skin prick testing, daily peak expiratory flow rates and symptoms of asthma was compared with placebo in a 7 week double-blind, parallel group study of 24 patients with extrinsic asthma. The study was in two parts: a 2 week assessment period, during which all patients received placebo tablets but recorded daily peak flow rates (PEFRs) and symptoms, preceding the 7 week double-blind comparison. 2. Azelastine, 4.4 mg, significantly decreased airway responsiveness to histamine compared with placebo both after a single dose (P less than 0.001), and following 7 weeks continuous treatment (P less than 0.02). Airway responsiveness to methacholine was not altered by administration of azelastine compared with placebo. 3. Skin prick test weal diameters to both allergen and histamine were significantly reduced after both a single dose and following 7 weeks continuous therapy treatment with azelastine. 4. There was a significant improvement in both the mean of the morning and the evening peak flow rates recorded during the last week compared with the first week of the study in the group receiving 4.4 mg of azelastine twice daily compared with placebo. Scores for wheeze were significantly reduced during the final 3 weeks of the study in patients receiving azelastine compared both with those receiving placebo and with the first week of the study (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.01). Consumption of inhaled bronchodilators fell significantly during the study in the group receiving azelastine therapy (P less than 0.05); no such fall occurred in the placebo treated patients. 5. A bitter metallic taste was reported by 58% of patients who received azelastine therapy.
机译:1.在一项针对24位外在性哮喘的7周双盲平行研究中,将4.4 mg氮卓斯汀口服对气道反应性,皮肤点刺试验,每日最大呼气流速和哮喘症状的影响与安慰剂进行了比较。该研究分为两个部分:一个为期2周的评估期,在此期间,所有患者均接受了安慰剂片剂,但在进行7周双盲比较之前记录了每日峰值流速(PEFR)和症状。 2.单剂量(P小于0.001)和连续治疗7周(P小于0.02)后,与安慰剂相比,4.4毫克氮卓斯汀显着降低了对组胺的气道反应性。与安慰剂相比,服用氮卓斯汀不会改变对乙酰甲胆碱的气道反应性。 3.在单剂给药后和用氮卓斯汀连续治疗7周后,针对过敏原和组胺的皮刺试验血径显着减小。 4.与安慰剂组相比,每天接受两次两次4.4毫克氮卓斯汀的组中,与研究的第一周相比,在最后一周记录的早晨和傍晚峰值流速均明显改善。与接受安慰剂的患者和研究的第一周相比,接受氮卓斯汀的患者在研究的最后3周内的喘息得分均显着降低(P小于0.05,P小于0.01)。在接受氮卓斯汀治疗的组中,吸入性支气管扩张剂的摄入量显着下降(P小于0.05);在安慰剂治疗的患者中没有发生这种下降。 5.据报道,接受氮卓斯汀治疗的患者中有58%的人感到金属味苦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号