首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Sports Medicine >The repeatability and criterion related validity of the 20 m multistage fitness test as a predictor of maximal oxygen uptake in active young men
【2h】

The repeatability and criterion related validity of the 20 m multistage fitness test as a predictor of maximal oxygen uptake in active young men

机译:20 m多阶段适应性试验的重复性和与标准相关的有效性可作为活跃年轻男性最大摄氧量的预测指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To investigate the repeatability and criterion related validity of the 20 m multistage fitness test (MFT) for predicting maximal oxygen uptake (Vo2max) in active young men. >Methods: Data were gathered from two phases using 30 subjects (±s; age = 21.8±3.6 years, mass = 76.9±10.7 kg, stature = 1.76±0.05 m). MFT repeatability was investigated in phase 1 where 21 subjects performed the test twice. The MFT criterion validity to predict Vo2max was investigated in phase 2 where 30 subjects performed a continuous incremental laboratory test to volitional exhaustion to determine Vo2max and the MFT. >Results: Phase 1 showed non-significant bias between the two applications of the MFT (diff±sdiff = –0.4±1.4 ml kg–1 min–1; t = –1.37, p = 0.190) with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ±2.7 ml kg–1 min–1 and heteroscedasticity 0.223 (p = 0.330). Log transformation of these data reduced heteroscedasticity to 0.056 (p = 0.808) with bias –0.007±0.025 (t = –1.35, p = 0.190) and LoA±0.049. Antilogs gave a mean bias on the ratio scale of 0.993 and random error (ratio limits) x/÷1.050. Phase 2 showed that the MFT significantly underpredicted Vo2max (diff±sdiff = 1.8±3.2 ml kg–1 min–1; t = 3.10, p = 0.004). LoA were ±6.3 ml kg–1 min–1 and heteroscedasticity 0.084 (p = 0.658). Log transformation reduced heteroscedasticity to –0.045 (p = 0.814) with LoA±0.110. The significant systematic bias was not eliminated (diff±sdiff = 0.033±0.056; t = 3.20, p = 0.003). Antilogs gave a mean bias of 1.034 with random errorx/÷1.116. >Conclusions: These findings lend support to previous investigations of the MFT by identifying that in the population assessed it provides results that are repeatable but it routinely underestimates Vo2max when compared to laboratory determinations. Unlike previous findings, however, these results show that when applying an arguably more appropriate analysis method, the MFT does not provide valid predictions of Vo2max.
机译:>目的:研究20 m多阶段适应性测试(MFT)的可重复性和与标准相关的有效性,以预测活跃的年轻男性的最大摄氧量(Vo2max)。 >方法:使用30名受试者(±s;年龄= 21.8±3.6岁,质量= 76.9±10.7 kg,身材= 1.76±0.05 m)从两个阶段收集数据。在阶段1中研究了MFT重复性,其中21位受试者进行了两次测试。在第2阶段研究了用MFT准则预测Vo2max的有效性,在该阶段中,有30名受试者进行了连续的增量实验室测试,以进行体力衰竭以确定Vo2max和MFT。 >结果:第一阶段显示了两次MFT应用之间的显着偏差(diff±sdiff = –0.4±1.4 ml kg –1 min –1 < / sup>; t = –1.37,p = 0.190),协议一致度(LoA)的95%为±2.7 ml kg –1 min -1 ,异方差为0.223(p = 0.330)。这些数据的对数转换将异方差降低至0.056(p = 0.808),偏差为–0.007±0.025(t = –1.35,p = 0.190)和LoA±0.049。 Antilogs在比率量表上给出了平均偏差0.993,随机误差(比率极限)x /÷1.050。第2阶段显示MFT大大低估了Vo2max(diff±sdiff = 1.8±3.2 ml kg –1 min -1 ; t = 3.10,p = 0.004)。 LoA为±6.3 ml kg –1 min –1 和异方差0.084(p = 0.658)。对数变换将异方差降低至–0.045(p = 0.814),LoA±0.110。没有消除明显的系统偏差(diff±sdiff = 0.033±0.056; t = 3.20,p = 0.003)。 Antilogs的平均偏差为1.034,随机误差为x /÷1.116。 >结论:这些发现为MFT提供了可重复的结果,但与实验室测定相比通常低估了Vo2max,从而为MFT以前的研究提供了支持。但是,与以前的发现不同,这些结果表明,当使用一种可能更合适的分析方法时,MFT无法提供Vo2max的有效预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号