首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the World Health Organization >Field trials of monovalent Ogawa and Inaba cholera vaccines in rural Bangladesh—three years of observation
【2h】

Field trials of monovalent Ogawa and Inaba cholera vaccines in rural Bangladesh—three years of observation

机译:孟加拉国农村的单价小川和稻叶霍乱疫苗的现场试验—观察三年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A controlled cholera vaccine field trial was carried out to test the efficacy of monovalent whole-cell Inaba and Ogawa cholera vaccines and a purified Inaba antigen. This study was designed particularly to study the level of protection produced by these vaccines against homologous and heterologous serotypes and to correlate the results with mouse protection tests and human serological response to the vaccines. A cohort of 45 000 children, aged 0-14 years, was divided into a control group and three vaccine groups. Inoculations were given annually for 2 years just before the start of the cholera season, and follow-up was continued for one additional year. Essentially, all cholera cases were due to the Inaba serotype, so that protection could be studied only against that serotype. Two annual injections of the whole-cell Inaba vaccine gave the highest level of protection, averaging 84% over the 3 years of follow-up; a single injection of the purified Inaba vaccine gave less protection (51%). Two annual injections of the whole-cell Ogawa vaccine failed to protect children under the age of 5 but did produce 48% protection for children aged 5-14 against Inaba cholera. Serological surveys correlated poorly with protection; specifically, the Ogawa vaccine produced high anti-Inaba titres in young children but no protection. The cross-protection against Inaba cholera produced by Ogawa vaccine in the older children is assumed to be due to boosting of naturally acquired immunity in this population. Monovalent vaccine cannot be recommended for general public health use because of the serotype specificity of protection that this study has demonstrated.
机译:进行了对照霍乱疫苗现场试验,以测试单价全细胞Inaba和Ogawa霍乱疫苗以及纯化的Inaba抗原的功效。这项研究的目的是专门研究这些疫苗对同源和异源血清型产生的保护水平,并将结果与​​小鼠保护试验和人类对该疫苗的血清学反应相关联。将4.5万名0-14岁的儿童分为对照组和三个疫苗组。在霍乱季节开始之前,每年接种一次疫苗,为期2年,并继续进行一年的随访。本质上,所有霍乱病例均归因于Inaba血清型,因此只能研究针对该血清型的保护措施。每年两次注射全细胞Inaba疫苗可提供最高的保护水平,在三年的随访中平均达到84%。单次注射纯化的Inaba疫苗的保护作用较小(51%)。每年两次注射全细胞小川疫苗无法保护5岁以下的儿童,但确实为5-14岁的儿童提供了48%的预防稻叶霍乱的保护。血清学检查与保护作用差;特别是,小川疫苗在幼儿中产生了很高的抗Inaba滴度,但没有保护作用。小川疫苗在大龄儿童中产生的针对稻叶霍乱的交叉保护被认为是由于该人群中自然获得性免疫力的增强。由于该研究证明了保护的血清型特异性,因此不建议将单价疫苗用于一般公共卫生用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号