首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology >Sources of Differences in On-Orbital Total Solar Irradiance Measurements and Description of a Proposed Laboratory Intercomparison
【2h】

Sources of Differences in On-Orbital Total Solar Irradiance Measurements and Description of a Proposed Laboratory Intercomparison

机译:轨道上太阳总辐照度测量值差异的来源以及拟议的实验室比对的描述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a 5 W/m2 (about 0.35 %) difference between current on-orbit Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) measurements. On 18–20 July 2005, a workshop was held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, Maryland that focused on understanding possible reasons for this difference, through an examination of the instrument designs, calibration approaches, and appropriate measurement equations. The instruments studied in that workshop included the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor III (ACRIM III) on the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor SATellite (ACRIMSAT), the Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) on the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE), the Variability of solar IRradiance and Gravity Oscillations (VIRGO) on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), and the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) on the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (ERBS). Presentations for each instrument included descriptions of its design, its measurement equation and uncertainty budget, and the methods used to assess on-orbit degradation. The workshop also included a session on satellite- and ground-based instrument comparisons and a session on laboratory-based comparisons and the application of new laboratory comparison techniques. The workshop has led to investigations of the effects of diffraction and of aperture area measurements on the differences between instruments. In addition, a laboratory-based instrument comparison is proposed that uses optical power measurements (with lasers that underfill the apertures of the TSI instruments), irradiance measurements (with lasers that overfill the apertures of the TSI instrument), and a cryogenic electrical substitution radiometer as a standard for comparing the instruments. A summary of the workshop and an overview of the proposed research efforts are presented here.
机译:当前在轨总太阳辐照度(TSI)测量之间相差5 W / m 2 (约0.35%)。 2005年7月18日至20日,在马里兰州盖瑟斯堡的国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)举行了研讨会,重点是通过检查仪器设计,校准方法和适当的测量来了解造成这种差异的可能原因。方程。在该研讨会上研究的仪器包括:主动腔辐射计辐照度监测仪SATellite(ACRIMSAT)上的主动腔辐射计辐照度监测仪III(ACRIMSAT),太阳辐射与气候实验(SORCE)上的总辐照度监测仪(TIM),可变性太阳和日球天文台(SOHO)上的太阳辐射和重力振荡(VIRGO),以及地球辐射预算卫星(ERBS)上的地球辐射预算实验(ERBE)。每种仪器的介绍都包括其设计,测量方程和不确定性预算以及用于评估在轨退化的方法的描述。讲习班还包括关于卫星和地面仪器比较的会议,以及关于实验室比较和新实验室比较技术的应用的会议。研讨会导致了对衍射和孔径面积测量对仪器之间差异的影响的研究。另外,提出了基于实验室的仪器比较,该仪器使用光功率测量(使用激光填充TSI仪器的孔径不足),辐照度测量(使用激光填充TSI仪器的孔径)和低温电子替代辐射计作为比较仪器的标准。这里介绍了研讨会的摘要和拟议的研究工作的概述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号