首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Surgery >Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery. 25.
【2h】

Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery. 25.

机译:加拿大普通外科医师协会和美国外科医师学院外科循证医学评论。 25

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Question: Does perioperative adjuvant therapy improve the outcome of operable gastric cancer? >Design: Multicentre randomized controlled trial. >Setting: Forty-five centres in the United Kingdom as well as centres in the Netherlands, Germany, Brazil, Singapore and New Zealand. >Patients: Five hundred and three patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach, esophogastric junction or lower esophagus were randomized to perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (n = 250 patients) or surgery alone (n = 253 patients). >Interventions: Patients who were assigned to the perioperative chemotherapy and surgery group received 3 doses of chemotherapy (epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil) preoperatively, followed by surgery 3–6 weeks after the third dose, and then 3 doses of postoperative chemotherapy beginning 6–12 weeks after surgery. Patients assigned to surgery alone were scheduled to have surgery within 6 weeks of randomization. The main outcome measure was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, assessments of downstaging, the surgeon's assessment of whether the surgery was curative and quality of life. >Results: Rates of postoperative complications were similar in both groups (46% v. 45%, respectively), as were the numbers of deaths within 30 days of surgery. The resected tumours were significantly smaller and less advanced in the group that received perioperative chemotherapy. With a mean follow-up of 4 years, 144 (60%) of the patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 170 (67%) of the patients in the surgery group died. The likelihood of overall survival was higher in the perioperative chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] for death 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.93; p = 0.009; 5-year survival rate 36% v. 23%), as was the likelihood of progression-free survival (HR for progression 0.66; 95% CI 0.53–0.81; p < 0.001). >Conclusion: Compared with the group receiving surgery alone, overall survival improved in the group receiving perioperative chemotherapy, as did progression-free survival among patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, esophogastric junction or lower esophagus.
机译:>问题:围手术期辅助治疗能否改善可手术胃癌的预后? >设计:多中心随机对照试验。 >设置:英国的45个中心以及荷兰,德国,巴西,新加坡和新西兰的中心。 >患者:将503例经组织学证实为胃腺癌,食管胃交界处或下食道腺癌的患者随机分配为围手术期化疗加手术(n = 250例)或仅手术(n = 253例)。 >干预措施:围手术期化疗和手术组的患者术前接受了3剂化学疗法(阿霉素,顺铂和氟尿嘧啶),然后在第三剂3-6周后接受手术,然后再进行3剂术后6至12周开始化疗的比例。仅安排手术的患者被安排在随机分配的6周内进行手术。主要结局指标是总体生存率。次要结果是无进展生存期,降级评估,外科医生对手术是否能治愈和生活质量的评估。 >结果:两组的术后并发症发生率相似(分别为46%和45%),以及手术30天内的死亡人数。在接受围手术期化疗的组中,切除的肿瘤明显较小,进展较慢。平均随访4年,围手术期化疗组144例(60%)患者和手术组170例(67%)患者死亡。围手术期化疗组总体生存的可能性更高(死亡风险比[HR] 0.75,95%置信区间[CI] 0.60-0.93; p = 0.009; 5年生存率36%对23%),无进展生存的可能性也是如此(HR为0.66; 95%CI为0.53–0.81; p <0.001)。 >结论:与单独接受手术的组相比,接受围手术期化疗的组的总生存期得到了改善,可切除的胃腺癌,食管胃交界处或食管下段腺癌患者的无进展生存期也得到了改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号