首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Communications >Randomized study of sinusoidal chronomodulated versus flat intermittent induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by traditional radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
【2h】

Randomized study of sinusoidal chronomodulated versus flat intermittent induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by traditional radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

机译:顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶联合传统放疗治疗局部区域晚期鼻咽癌的正弦脉动和扁平间歇诱导化疗的随机研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is the most common treatment regimen for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Whether chronomodulated infusion of chemotherapy can reduce its toxicity is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the toxic and therapeutic effects of sinusoidal chronomodulated infusion versus flat intermittent infusion of cisplatin (DDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by radiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Patients with biopsy-diagnosed untreated stages III and IV NPC (according to the 2002 UICC staging system) were randomized to undergo 2 cycles of sinusoidal chronomodulated infusion (Arm A) or flat intermittent constant rate infusion (Arm B) of DDP and 5-FU followed by radical radiotherapy. Using a “MELODIE” multi-channel programmed pump, the patients were given 12-hour continuous infusions of DDP (20 mg/m2) and 5-FU (750 mg/m2) for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. DDP was administered from 10:00 am to 10:00 pm, and 5-FU was administered from 10:00 pm to 10:00 am each day. Chronomodulated infusion was performed in Arm A, with the peak deliveries of 5-FU at 4:00 am and DDP at 4:00 pm. The patients in Arm B underwent a constant rate of infusion. Radiotherapy was initiated in the fifth week, and both arms were treated with the same radiotherapy techniques and dose fractions. Between June 2004 and June 2006, 125 patients were registered, and 124 were eligible for analysis of response and toxicity. The major toxicity observed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy was neutropenia. The incidence of acute toxicity was similar in both arms. During radiotherapy, the incidence of stomatitis was significantly lower in Arm A than in Arm B (38.1% vs. 59.0%, P = 0.020). No significant differences were observed for other toxicities. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 88.9%, 82.4%, and 74.8% for Arm A and 91.8%, 90.2%, and 82.1% for Arm B. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 91.7%, 88.1%, and 85.2% for Arm A and 100%, 94.5%, and 86.9% for Arm B. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 82.5%, 79.1%, and 79.1% for Arm A and 90.2%, 85.2%, and 81.7% for Arm B. Chronochemotherapy significantly reduced stomatitis but was not superior to standard chemotherapy in terms of hematologic toxicities and therapeutic response.
机译:新辅助化疗加放疗是晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)的最常见治疗方案。尚不清楚计时输注化疗是否可以降低其毒性。这项研究旨在评估局部区域晚期鼻咽癌患者的正弦等时同步输注与顺铂(DDP)和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)连续间歇输注以及放疗的毒性和治疗效果。活检诊断为未经治疗的III期和IV期NPC(根据2002 UICC分期系统)的患者被随机分配为2个周期的DDP和5-FU的正弦脉动输注(Arm A)或扁平间歇恒速输注(Arm B)周期随后进行彻底放疗。使用“ MELODIE”多通道程控泵,为患者提供12小时连续输注DDP(20 mg / m 2 )和5-FU(750 mg / m 2 < / sup>)5天,每3周重复2个周期。每天从上午10:00到晚上10:00进行DDP给药,每天下午10:00到上午10:00进行5-FU给药。在A组中进行了定时输注,其中5-FU的高峰递送时间为4:00 am,DDP的高峰递送时间为4:00 pm。 B组患者接受了恒定的输注速度。在第五周开始放疗,并用相同的放疗技术和剂量分数对两只手臂进行治疗。在2004年6月至2006年6月之间,共登记了125位患者,其中124位有资格进行反应和毒性分析。新辅助化疗期间观察到的主要毒性反应是中性粒细胞减少。两组急性毒性的发生率相似。在放疗期间,A组的口腔炎发生率明显低于B组(38.1%对59.0%,P = 0.020)。其他毒性没有观察到明显差异。 A组的1年,3年和5年总生存率分别为88.9%,82.4%和74.8%,B组的总生存率为91.8%,90.2%和82.1%。1、3和5 A组的年度无进展生存率分别为91.7%,88.1%和85.2%,B组的100%,94.5%和86.9%。1年,3年和5年无远处转移的生存率A组的发生率分别为82.5%,79.1%和79.1%,B组的发生率分别为90.2%,85.2%和81.7%。计时疗法显着减少了口腔炎,但就血液学毒性和治疗反应而言,并不优于标准化学疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号