首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Informatics >A Biological Evaluation of Six Gene Set Analysis Methods for Identification of Differentially Expressed Pathways in Microarray Data
【2h】

A Biological Evaluation of Six Gene Set Analysis Methods for Identification of Differentially Expressed Pathways in Microarray Data

机译:鉴定微阵列数据中差异表达途径的六种基因组分析方法的生物学评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gene-set analysis of microarray data evaluates biological pathways, or gene sets, for their differential expression by a phenotype of interest. In contrast to the analysis of individual genes, gene-set analysis utilizes existing biological knowledge of genes and their pathways in assessing differential expression. This paper evaluates the biological performance of five gene-set analysis methods testing “self-contained null hypotheses” via subject sampling, along with the most popular gene-set analysis method, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). We use three real microarray analyses in which differentially expressed gene sets are predictable biologically from the phenotype. Two types of gene sets are considered for this empirical evaluation: one type contains “truly positive” sets that should be identified as differentially expressed; and the other type contains “truly negative” sets that should not be identified as differentially expressed. Our evaluation suggests advantages of SAM-GS, Global, and ANCOVA Global methods over GSEA and the other two methods.
机译:微阵列数据的基因组分析通过目标表型评估生物途径或基因组的差异表达。与单个基因的分析相反,基因组分析利用了基因及其路径的现有生物学知识来评估差异表达。本文评估了通过受试者抽样测试“自成零假设”的五种基因组分析方法的生物学性能,以及最流行的基因组分析方法“基因组富集分析”(GSEA)。我们使用三个真正的微阵列分析,其中差异表达的基因集是可从表型生物学上预测的。对于这种经验评估,考虑了两种类型的基因集:一种类型包含应被识别为差异表达的“真正阳性”集;另一类包含“真实否定”集,不应将其标识为差异表达。我们的评估表明,与GSEA和其他两种方法相比,SAM-GS,Global和ANCOVA Global方法具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号