首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Imaging >Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:内镜和经皮胆道引流治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的疗效和并发症比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundMalignant obstructive jaundice is a common problem in the clinic. Currently, the generally applied treatment methods are percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD). Nevertheless, there has not been a uniform conclusion published on either efficacy of the two types of drainage or the incidence rate of complications. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice, to determine whether there is any difference between percutaneous and endoscopic biliary drainage, with respect to efficacy and incidence rate of overall complications.
机译:背景恶性阻塞性黄疸是临床上的常见问题。当前,普遍应用的治疗方法是经皮经肝胆道引流(PTBD)和内镜胆道引流(EBD)。然而,关于两种引流的疗效或并发症的发生率,尚无统一的结论。因此,我们对恶性阻塞性黄疸的内镜和经皮胆道引流进行了比较,进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,以确定经皮胆道引流和内镜下胆道引流在疗效和总并发症发生率方面是否存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号