首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancers >Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models
【2h】

Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models

机译:通过纳入LET和RBE模型来实现质子治疗的全部临床潜力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite increasing use of proton therapy (PBT), several systematic literature reviews show limited gains in clinical outcomes, with publications mostly devoted to recent technical developments. The lack of randomised control studies has also hampered progress in the acceptance of PBT by many oncologists and policy makers. There remain two important uncertainties associated with PBT, namely: (1) accuracy and reproducibility of Bragg peak position (BPP); and (2) imprecise knowledge of the relative biological effect (RBE) for different tissues and tumours, and at different doses. Incorrect BPP will change dose, linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE, with risks of reduced tumour control and enhanced toxicity. These interrelationships are discussed qualitatively with respect to the ICRU target volume definitions. The internationally accepted proton RBE of 1.1 was based on assays and dose ranges unlikely to reveal the complete range of RBE in the human body. RBE values are not known for human (or animal) brain, spine, kidney, liver, intestine, etc. A simple efficiency model for estimating proton RBE values is described, based on data of Belli et al. and other authors, which allows linear increases in α and β with LET, with a gradient estimated using a saturation model from the low LET α and β radiosensitivity parameter input values, and decreasing RBE with increasing dose. To improve outcomes, 3-D dose-LET-RBE and bio-effectiveness maps are required. Validation experiments are indicated in relevant tissues. Randomised clinical studies that test the invariant 1.1 RBE allocation against higher values in late reacting tissues, and lower tumour RBE values in the case of radiosensitive tumours, are also indicated.
机译:尽管越来越多地使用质子治疗(PBT),但一些系统的文献综述显示,临床结果的获益有限,出版物大多致力于近期的技术发展。缺乏随机对照研究也阻碍了许多肿瘤学家和政策制定者对PBT的接受。与PBT相关的两个重要不确定因素是:(1)布拉格峰位置(BPP)的准确性和可重复性; (2)对不同组织和肿瘤,不同剂量的相对生物学效应(RBE)的了解不深。错误的BPP会改变剂量,线性能量转移(LET)和RBE,存在降低肿瘤控制和增强毒性的风险。关于ICRU目标量定义,对这些相互关系进行了定性讨论。国际公认的1.1质子RBE基于测定和剂量范围,不可能揭示人体内RBE的完整范围。对于人(或动物)的脑,脊柱,肾脏,肝脏,肠等,RBE值未知。基于Belli等人的数据,描述了一种简单的估算质子RBE值的效率模型。和其他作者,这允许使用LET线性增加α和β,使用饱和模型根据低LETα和β放射敏感性参数输入值估算出梯度,并随剂量增加而降低RBE。为了改善结果,需要3-D剂量LET-RBE和生物有效性图。验证实验在相关组织中进行。还指出了针对晚期反应组织中较高的值和在放射敏感性肿瘤情况下较低的肿瘤RBE值测试不变的1.1 RBE分配的随机临床研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号