首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Case Reports in Dentistry >Root Canal Stripping: Malpractice or Common Procedural Accident—An Ethical Dilemma in Endodontics
【2h】

Root Canal Stripping: Malpractice or Common Procedural Accident—An Ethical Dilemma in Endodontics

机译:根管剥除:医疗事故或共同程序性事故—牙髓治疗的伦理困境

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Root canal stripping is defined as an oblong, vertical perforation that appears especially in the middle section of curved root canals during endodontic treatments with nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) instruments. Its occurrence may drastically affect the outcome of the treatment, transforming a common otherwise efficient endodontic procedure into a complication such as tooth extraction. In order to discuss the ethical and legal consequences, two cases of dental strip perforations are herewith presented. Due to the existence of risk factors for dental strip perforation, experience of the clinician and the use of magnification and modern imagistic methods (CBCT) may avoid or reduce the frequency of this type of accidents. Under correct working circumstances, dental stripping should not be regarded as a malpractice but as a procedural accident. However, the patient must always be informed, before and during the endodontic procedure, about the event and the possible complications that may occur.
机译:根管剥离术定义为长方形的垂直穿孔,在镍钛(Ni-Ti)器械进行牙髓治疗期间,尤其出现在弯曲的根管的中间部分。它的发生可能会严重影响治疗结果,从而将通常有效的牙髓治疗程序转变为并发症,例如拔牙。为了讨论道德和法律后果,现介绍两种齿条穿孔的情况。由于存在齿条穿孔的危险因素,临床医生的经验以及使用放大倍数和现代影像学方法(CBCT)可以避免或减少此类事故的发生率。在正确的工作环境下,拔牙不应视为不法行为,而应视为程序性事故。但是,在进行牙髓治疗之前和期间,必须始终告知患者有关事件以及可能发生的并发症的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号