首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine >Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
【2h】

Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy

机译:两种不同的结肠结肠镜清洗方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The appropriate colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG solution for the afternoon colonoscopy. >Methods: This comparative study compared the AM to PM prep for afternoon outpatient colonoscopy. The subjects randomly received PEG PM dose ;4 liters of water plus 4 pack PEG powder at 6 pm before colonoscopy (250 ml every 15 min) or AM ( the same dose solution at 6 am on the day of colonoscopy). The preparation and colonoscopy quality, PEG side effects, sleep quality, lesion detection, flush need and suction fluid were compared in these two groups. >Results: One hundred seven cases received AM prep and 102 received PM prep. The colon prep was adequate in 94.4% in AM group and in 90.2% cases in PM group (P=0.2). The incidence of adverse events in these two groups was similar. Sleep quality and the need for flush was lower in the AM group (P=0.004 and P=0.03). The mean volume of suction fluid was higher in the AM group (P=0.01). The detected lesions were similar between the two groups. Adequate prep was associated with lower flush need in AM group (P=0.001). >Conclusion: AM and PM PEG solutions were clinically equivalent with cleansing efficacy and side effect and lesion detection. AM group was associated with a better sleep quality and less flush need, but more suction fluid.
机译:>背景:适当的结肠清洗是结肠镜检查质量的主要决定因素。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较上午结肠镜检查上午(AM)PEG(聚乙二醇)溶液与早晚(PM)PEG溶液的功效和耐受性。 >方法:该比较研究对下午门诊结肠镜检查的AM与PM准备进行了比较。受试者在结肠镜检查之前(下午每隔15分钟250毫升)或AM(结肠镜检查当天上午6点使用相同剂量的溶液)之前的下午6点随机接受PEG PM剂量; 4升水加4包PEG粉末。比较两组的制备和结肠镜检查质量,PEG副作用,睡眠质量,病灶检测,需要冲洗和吸液。 >结果:一百零七例接受了AM预防,102例接受了PM预防。 AM组为94.4%,PM组为90.2%,结肠准备足够(P = 0.2)。两组的不良事件发生率相似。 AM组的睡眠质量和冲水需求较低(P = 0.004和P = 0.03)。 AM组的抽吸液平均体积较高(P = 0.01)。两组之间检测到的病变相似。充足的准备与较低的潮红需要量相关(P = 0.001)。 >结论: AM和PM PEG溶液在临床上等效,具有清洁功效,副作用和病变检测。 AM组与较好的睡眠质量和较少的冲水需要有关,但抽吸液较多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号