首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Cardiology >Long‐term follow‐up after deferring angioplasty in asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical in‐stent restenosis
【2h】

Long‐term follow‐up after deferring angioplasty in asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical in‐stent restenosis

机译:无症状中度非关键性支架内再狭窄的无症状患者推迟血管成形术后的长期随访

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Many patients with in‐stent restenosis (ISR) are angina‐free, but the optimal treatment for these patients remains uncertain. Hypothesis: In cases with asymptomatic moderate noncritical ISR, deferral of the intervention may be safe and associated with favorable clinical outcome. Methods: We evaluated the long‐term clinical outcome of asymptomatic patients (Group 1, n = 98) with moderate non‐critical ISR (< 70% diameter stenosis) after intervention was deferred, and compared it with that of patients (Group 2, n = 655) without restenosis. After repeat angioplasty was deferred, all patients were treated medically and later underwent angioplasty only in the case of clinical recurrence. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical follow‐up was available in all patients at 26.3 ± 15.9 months. Twenty patients died during the follow‐up: 1 in Group 1 and 19 in Group 2. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 3 patients in Group 1 and 11 patients in Group 2 during follow‐up (p = NS), and new lesion revascularization in 2 patients in Group 1 and 27 patients in Group 2 (p = NS). Event‐free survival rate (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) was 86.7 ± 6.1% in Group 1 and 84.8 ± 2.2% in Group 2 at the end of follow‐up (p = NS). Major adverse cardiac events were only associated with the presence of diabetic mellitus (hazards ratio 2.65,95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48–4.73, p < 0.01). The percentage of patients receiving antianginal medication was similar between the two groups at the end of the study (p = NS). Conclusions: Asymptomatic patients with moderate non‐critical ISR have a good prognosis and similar clinical outcome as those without ISR, suggesting that it may be safe to defer repeat angioplasty in these patients until angina recurrence.
机译:背景:许多支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者无心绞痛,但对于这些患者的最佳治疗仍不确定。假设:在无症状的中度非关键性ISR病例中,推迟干预可能是安全的,并会带来良好的临床效果。方法:我们评估了延迟干预后无症状中度非关键性ISR(直径狭窄<70%)的无症状患者(第1组,n = 98)的长期临床结局,并将其与患者(第2组)进行了比较。 n = 655),无再狭窄。推迟重复血管成形术后,所有患者均接受药物治疗,仅在临床复发的情况下才进行血管成形术。结果:两组的基线特征相似。在26.3±15.9个月内对所有患者进行临床随访。随访期间有20例患者死亡:第1组中的1例和第2组中的19例。随访期间,在第1组中的3例患者和第2组中的11例患者中进行了目标病变血运重建(p = NS),以及新的病变血运重建第1组的2例患者和第2组的27例患者(p = NS)。随访结束时,第1组无事件生存率(心脏死亡,非致命性心肌梗塞,重复血运重建)为86.7±6.1%,第2组为84.8±2.2%(p = NS)。严重的不良心脏事件仅与糖尿病有关(危险比2.65,95%置信区间[CI] 1.48–4.73,p <0.01)。在研究结束时两组之间接受抗心绞痛药物治疗的患者百分比相似(p = NS)。结论:中度非关键性ISR的无症状患者预后良好,临床预后与没有ISR的患者相似,这表明将这些患者的重复血管成形术推迟至心绞痛复发可能是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号