首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cell Death Discovery >Warm blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
【2h】

Warm blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

机译:冠状动脉搭桥术中热血停搏与冷晶体停搏对心肌的保护

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We retrospectively analyzed early results of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery using two different types of cardioplegia for myocardial protection: antegrade intermittent warm blood or cold crystalloid cardioplegia. From January 2015 to October 2016, 330 consecutive patients underwent isolated on-pump CABG. Cardiac arrest was obtained with use of warm blood cardioplegia (WBC group, n = 297) or cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CCC group, n = 33), according to the choice of the surgeon. Euroscore II and preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups, except for the creatinine clearance, slightly lower in WBC group (77.33 ± 27.86 mL/min versus 88.77 ± 51.02 mL/min) (P < 0.05). Complete revascularization was achieved in both groups. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% (n = 6) in WBC group, absent in CCC group. The required mean number of cardioplegia’s doses per patient was higher in WBC group (2.3 ± 0.8) versus CCC group (2.0 ± 0.7) (P = 0.045), despite a lower number of distal coronary artery anastomoses (2.7 ± 0.8 versus 3.2 ± 0.9) (P = 0.0001). Cardiopulmonary and aortic cross-clamp times were similar in both groups. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (WBC group 3.4% versus CCC group 3.0%) and low cardiac output syndrome (4.4% versus 3.0%) were similar in both groups. As compared with WBC group, in CCC group CK-MB/CK ratio >10% was lower during each time points of evaluation, with a statistical significant difference at time 0 (4% ± 1.6% versus 5% ± 2.5%) (P = 0.021). In presence of complete revascularization, despite the value of CK-MB/CK ratio >10% was less in the CCC group, clinical results were not affected by both types of cardioplegia adopted to myocardial protection. As compared with cold crystalloid, warm blood cardioplegia requires a shorter interval of administration to achieve better myocardial protection.
机译:我们回顾性分析了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术使用两种不同类型的心脏麻痹进行心肌保护的早期结果:顺行性间歇性温血或冷晶体性心脏麻痹。从2015年1月到2016年10月,连续330例患者接受了独立的泵浦CABG治疗。根据外科医生的选择,通过使用温血心脏停搏(WBC组,n = 297)或冷晶体心脏停搏(CCC组,n = 33)来进行心脏骤停。两组的Euroscore II和术前特征相似,除了肌酐清除率外,WBC组略低(77.33±27.86 mL / min,而88.77±51.02 mL / min)(P <0.05)。两组均完全血运重建。 WBC组的院内死亡率为2.0%(n = 6),而CCC组则没有。尽管远端冠状动脉吻合术的数目较少(2.7±±0.8)与3.2±±0.9(0.9),但WBC组(2.3±±0.8)比CCC组(2.0±±0.7)(P per = 0.045)的每位患者平均心脏停搏剂量更高。 )(P = 0.0001)。两组的心肺和主动脉交叉钳夹时间相似。两组的围手术期心肌梗死(WBC组为3.4%,CCC组为3.0%)和低心输出量综合征(4.4%对3.0%)的发生率相似。与WBC组相比,CCC组在每个评估时间点的CK-MB / CK比率均> 10%,在时间0时有统计学差异(4%±1.6%vs 5%±2.5%)(P = 0.021)。在完全血运重建的情况下,尽管CCC组的CK-MB / CK比值> 10%较小,但临床结果不受两种用于心肌保护的心脏停搏的影响。与冷晶体相比,温血心脏停搏需要更短的给药间隔,以实现更好的心肌保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号