首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Medicine >Regulation of medicines and medical devices: contrasts and similarities
【2h】

Regulation of medicines and medical devices: contrasts and similarities

机译:药品和医疗器械监管:异同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent times, there has been an unprecedented level of public interest and active debate regarding the regulation of medical devices. This is in light of the topical, rather dissimilar, incidents involving poly-implant-prothèse (PIP) breast and metal-on-metal hip implants. Although medicines and devices are regulated under European Union (EU) law, the regulatory regimes are very different and some have argued that features of the pharmaceutical regime should be applied to medical devices in the current review of the medical devices directives. Both medicines and certain devices need to have an assessment of their risks and benefits before being used in patients, and undergo subsequent monitoring for adverse events. However, there are significant differences between these two groups in terms of the number of products, the pattern of innovation and development, and the types of adverse events that arise from their use. This review will summarise the key issues through a comparison of how both are regulated and monitored.
机译:近年来,公众对医疗器械的监管出现了前所未有的兴趣,并进行了积极的辩论。鉴于涉及多发性假牙(PIP)的乳房和金属对金属的髋关节植入物的局部事件相当不同。尽管药物和设备受欧盟(EU)法律监管,但监管制度却大不相同,有人认为,在当前对医疗器械指令的审查中,应将医疗制度的特征应用于医疗器械。药物和某些设备在用于患者中之前都需要对其风险和益处进行评估,并进行后续不良事件监测。但是,在产品数量,创新和开发模式以及使用它们引起的不良事件的类型方面,这两组之间存在显着差异。这篇综述将通过比较两者的监管方式来总结关键问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号