首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Science or Coaches’ Eye? – Both! Beneficial Collaboration of Multidimensional Measurements and Coach Assessments for Efficient Talent Selection in Elite Youth Football
【2h】

Science or Coaches’ Eye? – Both! Beneficial Collaboration of Multidimensional Measurements and Coach Assessments for Efficient Talent Selection in Elite Youth Football

机译:科学还是教练的眼睛? –都!多维测量与教练评估的有益合作以提高优秀青年足球的才华

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Due to the tremendous popularity of youth football, practitioners in this domain face the ongoing question of the most effective solutions in early talent selection. Although the scientific community has suggested multidimensional models for some time, coach assessments and motor performance tests remain common. Earlier research has determined the strengths and weaknesses within these different approaches. The current investigation directly compared the effectiveness of each approach in talent selection (coach assessment vs. motor performance tests vs. multidimensional data). A sample of 117 youth football players, their parents, and coaches participated in multidimensional measurements in the U14 age category (coach assessments, motor performance tests, psychological characteristics, familial support, training history, and biological maturation). The area under the curve (AUC [95% CI]) from receiver operating characteristic indicated the prognostic validity of each approach in predicting U19 player status five years after the assessments (professional vs. non-professional). Motor performance tests (0.71 [0.58; 0.84]) showed a lower AUC than the multidimensional data (0.85 [0.76; 0.94], p = 0.02), whilst coach assessments did not differ from the two others (.82 [.74; .90]). Further, combined talent selection approaches, especially the use of coach assessments and multidimensional data together, were significantly better at predicting U19 player status (0.93 [0.87; 0.98], p = 0.02 vs. multidimensional data only). Although certain limitations may impede further insights (summation of data, skipped use of non-linear statistics), scientific claims for using multidimensionality within talent selection were confirmed to be fruitful. In particular, the combination of the subjective coaches’ eye with scientific data may buffer the mutual weaknesses of these different approaches. Future research should focus on optimizing the output of promising multidimensional models. Knowledge of detailed values relating to specific dimensions within these models and the implementation of enhanced non-linear statistics may enable further improvements in the field of talent selection.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Combined talent selection approaches with coach assessments and measured data are fruitful.Multidimensional data (motor performance tests, psychological characteristics, familial support, training history, biological maturation) outperformed motor performance tests only.Improvement of non-linear statistics might further enhance the use of multidimensional data for talent selection.
机译:由于青少年足球的巨大普及,该领域的从业者面临着早期选拔人才方面最有效解决方案的问题。尽管科学界建议使用多维模型已有一段时间,但教练评估和运动能力测试仍然很普遍。较早的研究已经确定了这些不同方法的优点和缺点。当前的调查直接比较了每种方法在选拔人才方面的有效性(教练评估与运动成绩测试与多维数据)。从117名青少年足球运动员,他们的父母和教练中抽取了一个样本,参加了U14年龄组的多维测量(教练评估,运动能力测试,心理特征,家庭支持,训练历史和生物学成熟度)。接受者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUC [95%CI])表明评估后五年(专业与非专业),每种方法在预测U19球员状态时的预后有效性。运动能力测试(0.71 [0.58; 0.84])显示的AUC低于多维数据(0.85 [0.76; 0.94],p = 0.02),而教练评估与其他两项没有差异(.82 [.74;。 90])。此外,综合选拔人才的方法,特别是教练评估和多维数据的结合使用,在预测U19球员状态方面显着更好(0.93 [0.87; 0.98],p = 0.02,仅多维数据)。尽管某些局限性可能会阻碍进一步的洞察力(数据汇总,非线性统计的跳过使用),但在人才选拔中使用多维性的科学主张被证实是富有成果的。特别是,主观教练的眼光与科学数据的结合可以缓解这些不同方法的共同缺点。未来的研究应集中在优化有前途的多维模型的输出。了解这些模型中与特定维度有关的详细值以及增强的非线性统计信息的实现可以在人才选择领域实现进一步的改进。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc “> <!-list-behavior =无序前缀-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 将人才选拔方法与教练评估和实测数据相结合是卓有成效的。 多维数据(运动表现测验,心理特征,家庭支持,训练经历,生物学成熟度)仅胜过运动表现测验。 非线性统计数据的改进可能会进一步提高多维数据的使用率人才选拔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号