首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Mean Blood Pressure Assessment during Post-Exercise: Result from Two Different Methods of Calculation
【2h】

Mean Blood Pressure Assessment during Post-Exercise: Result from Two Different Methods of Calculation

机译:运动后的平均血压评估:两种不同计算方法的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

At rest the proportion between systolic and diastolic periods of the cardiac cycle is about 1/3 and 2/3 respectively. Therefore, mean blood pressure (MBP) is usually calculated with a standard formula (SF) as follows: MBP = diastolic blood pressure (DBP) + 1/3 [systolic blood pressure (SBP) – DBP]. However, during exercise this proportion is lost because of tachycardia, which shortens diastole more than systole. We analysed the difference in MBP calculation between the SF and a corrected formula (CF) which takes into account changes in the diastolic and systolic periods caused by exercise-induced tachycardia. Our hypothesis was that the SF potentially induce a systematic error in MBP assessment during recovery after exercise. Ten healthy males underwent two exercise-recovery tests on a cycle-ergometer at mild-moderate and moderate-heavy workloads. Hemodynamics and MBP were monitored for 30 minutes after exercise bouts. The main result was that the SF on average underestimated MBP by –4.1 mmHg with respect to the CF. Moreover, in the period immediately after exercise, when sustained tachycardia occurred, the difference between SF and CF was large (in the order of -20-30 mmHg). Likewise, a systematic error in systemic vascular resistance assessment was present. It was concluded that the SF introduces a substantial error in MBP estimation in the period immediately following effort. This equation should not be used in this situation.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">The standard formula often employed to calculate mean blood pressure during recovery from exercise may introduce a substantial error in the estimation of this parameter;This equation should not be used in this situation;Instead a corrected formula, which calculates mean blood pressure taking into account the systolic and diastolic proportion during the cardiac cycle, should be employed.No significant hypotensive due to exercise effect was detected using this formula.
机译:静止时,心动周期的收缩期和舒张期之间的比例分别约为1/3和2/3。因此,通常使用标准公式(SF)来计算平均血压(MBP),如下所示:MBP =舒张压(DBP)+ 1/3 [收缩压(SBP)– DBP]。然而,在运动过程中,由于心动过速而失去了这一比例,舒张期比收缩期缩短了更多。我们分析了SF和校正公式(CF)之间MBP计算的差异,该校正公式考虑了运动引起的心动过速引起的舒张期和收缩期的变化。我们的假设是,SF在运动后恢复期间可能会导致MBP评估中出现系统性错误。十名健康男性在轻度中度和中度重度工作量下,在自行车测功机上进行了两次运动恢复测试。运动后30分钟监测血流动力学和MBP。主要结果是,SF相对于CF平均低估了MBP –4.1 mmHg。此外,在运动后的一段时间内,当发生持续性心动过速时,SF和CF之间的差异较大(约为-20-30 mmHg)。同样,在系统性血管阻力评估中存在系统错误。结论是,SF在紧随其后的一段时间内在MBP估计中引入了重大错误。在这种情况下,不应使用此方程式。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max -label-size = 0-> 在运动后恢复过程中经常用来计算平均血压的标准公式可能会在此参数的估算中引入实质性错误; 该方程式不应为在这种情况下使用; 应使用校正后的公式,该公式应考虑心动周期中收缩压和舒张压的比例来计算平均血压。 没有明显的降压药使用此公式可以检测出运动效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号