首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science >Comparison of two agar gel immunodiffusion protocols for diagnosing equineinfectious anemia
【2h】

Comparison of two agar gel immunodiffusion protocols for diagnosing equineinfectious anemia

机译:两种琼脂凝胶免疫扩散方案诊断马的比较传染性贫血

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) protocols for diagnosing equine infectious anemia. Two commercial testing kits were used: one following the Japanese Act on Domestic Animal Infectious Diseases Control and one following the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) manual. From 651 samples tested, both protocols gave identical results for 647 samples (23 samples tested positive; 624 tested negative). Non-specific reactions were observed in 21 samples testing negative by the Japanese protocol, but none were observed with the OIE protocol. The kappa coefficient value was 0.962, indicating almost perfect agreement between the two protocols. This study found no difference in diagnostic agreement between the two protocols, but the OIE protocol produced non-specific reactions less frequently than the Japanese protocol.
机译:这项研究比较了琼脂凝胶免疫扩散(AGID)方案来诊断马传染性贫血。使用了两种商业测试套件:一种遵循《日本家畜传染病控制法》,另一种遵循世界动物卫生组织(OIE)手册。从651个测试样品中,两种方案对647个样品给出了相同的结果(23个样品测试为阳性; 624个样品测试为阴性)。日本协议在21份测试阴性的样品中观察到非特异性反应,但OIE协议未观察到任何特异性反应。 kappa系数值为0.962,表明这两个协议之间几乎完全一致。这项研究发现两种方案之间的诊断一致性没有差异,但是OIE方案产生非特异性反应的频率低于日本方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号