首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Critical Care Research and Practice >Comparison of Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Optimization Using Pulmonary Artery Catheter and Transpulmonary Thermodilution in Combined Valve Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial
【2h】

Comparison of Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Optimization Using Pulmonary Artery Catheter and Transpulmonary Thermodilution in Combined Valve Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:肺动脉导管和经肺热稀释联合瓣膜修复的目标导向血流动力学优化的比较:一项随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Our aim was to compare the effects of goal-directed therapy guided either by pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) or by transpulmonary thermodilution (TTD) combined with monitoring of oxygen transport on perioperative hemodynamics and outcome after complex elective valve surgery. Measurements and Main Results. Forty patients were randomized into two equal groups: a PAC group and a TTD group. In the PAC group, therapy was guided by mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), whereas in the TTD group we additionally used global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), and oxygen delivery index (DO2I). We observed a gradual increase in GEDVI, whereas EVLWI and PAOP decreased by 20–30% postoperatively (P < 0.05). The TTD group received 20% more fluid accompanied by increased stroke volume index and DO2I by 15–20% compared to the PAC group (P < 0.05). Duration of mechanical ventilation was increased by 5.2 hrs in the PAC group (P = 0.04). Conclusions. As compared to the PAC-guided algorithm, goal-directed therapy based on transpulmonary thermodilution and oxygen transport increases the volume of fluid therapy, improves hemodynamics and DO2I, and reduces the duration of respiratory support after complex valve surgery.
机译:我们的目的是比较通过肺动脉导管(PAC)或经肺热稀释(TTD)指导的目标导向疗法与氧气监测对复杂选择性瓣膜手术后围手术期血流动力学和预后的影响。测量和主要结果。 40名患者被随机分为两组:PAC组和TTD组。在PAC组中,治疗以平均动脉压(MAP),心脏指数(CI)和肺动脉闭塞压(PAOP)为指导,而在TTD组中,我们另外使用总体舒张末期容积指数(GEDVI),血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)和氧气输送指数(DO2I)。我们观察到GEDVI逐渐增加,而EVLWI和PAOP术后降低了20–30%(P <0.05)。与PAC组相比,TTD组的体液量增加了20%,并伴有中风量指数和DO2I增加15–20%(P <0.05)。 PAC组的机械通气时间增加了5.2小时(P = 0.04)。结论。与PAC引导的算法相比,基于经肺热稀释和氧气传输的目标导向疗法增加了流体疗法的体积,改善了血流动力学和DO2I,并减少了复杂瓣膜手术后呼吸支持的持续时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号