首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Critical Care >Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups
【2h】

Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups

机译:临床评论:目标导向疗法-手术患者的证据是什么?对不同风险人群的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with limited cardiac reserve are less likely to survive and develop more complications following major surgery. By augmenting oxygen delivery index (DO2I) with a combination of intravenous fluids and inotropes (goal directed therapy (GDT)), postoperative mortality and morbidity of high-risk patients may be reduced. However, although most studies suggest that GDT may improve outcome in high-risk surgical patients, it is still not widely practiced. We set out to test the hypothesis that GDT results in greatest benefit in terms of mortality and morbidity in patients with the highest risk of mortality and have undertaken a systematic review of the current literature to see if this is correct. We performed a systematic search of Medline, Embase and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and reviews of GDT in surgical patients. To minimize heterogeneity we excluded studies involving cardiac, trauma, and paediatric surgery. Extremely high risk, high risk and intermediate risks of mortality were defined as >20%, 5 to 20% and <5% mortality rates in the control arms of the trials, respectively. Meta analyses were performed and Forest plots drawn using RevMan software. Data are presented as odd ratios (OR; 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P-values). A total of 32 RCTs including 2,808 patients were reviewed. All studies reported mortality. Five studies (including 300 patients) were excluded from assessment of complication rates as the number of patients with complications was not reported. The mortality benefit of GDT was confined to the extremely high-risk group (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.41; P < 0.0001). Complication rates were reduced in all subgroups (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.60; P < 0.00001). The morbidity benefit was greatest amongst patients in the extremely high-risk subgroup (OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.51; P < 0.0001), followed by the intermediate risk subgroup (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.67; P = 0.0002), and the high-risk subgroup (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.89; P = 0.01). Despite heterogeneity in trial quality and design, we found GDT to be beneficial in all high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. The mortality benefit of GDT was confined to the subgroup of patients at extremely high risk of death. The reduction of complication rates was seen across all subgroups of GDT patients.
机译:心脏储备有限的患者在大手术后存活的可能性较小,并出现更多的并发症。通过结合静脉输液和正性肌力药物(目标定向疗法(GDT))提高输氧指数(DO2I),可以降低高危患者的术后死亡率和发病率。但是,尽管大多数研究表明,GDT可以改善高危手术患者的预后,但仍未广泛应用。我们着手检验以下假设,即GDT在死亡率最高的患者中,在死亡率和发病率方面可带来最大的收益,并已对当前文献进行了系统的综述,看是否正确。我们对Medline,Embase和CENTRAL数据库进行了系统搜索,以寻找手术患者的随机对照试验(RCT)和GDT评估。为了尽量减少异质性,我们排除了涉及心脏,创伤和儿科手术的研究。在试验的对照组中,死亡率的极高风险,高风险和中等风险分别定义为死亡率> 20%,5%至20%和<5%。进行荟萃分析,并使用RevMan软件绘制Forest图。数据以奇数比(OR; 95%置信区间(CI)和P值)表示。共审查了32项RCT,包括2808例患者。所有研究均报告了死亡率。由于未报告有并发症的患者人数,因此五项研究(包括300例患者)被排除在并发症发生率之外。 GDT的死亡率收益仅限于极高风险组(OR = 0.20,95%CI 0.09至0.41; P <0.0001)。所有亚组的并发症发生率均降低(OR = 0.45,95%CI 0.34至0.60; P <0.00001)。在极高风险亚组中,患者的发病率获益最大(OR = 0.27,95%CI 0.15至0.51; P <0.0001),其次是中等风险亚组(OR = 0.43,95%CI 0.27至0.67; P = 0.0002),以及高风险亚组(OR 0.56,95%CI 0.36至0.89; P = 0.01)。尽管试验质量和设计存在异质性,但我们发现GDT对所有接受大手术的高危患者均有益。 GDT的死亡率优势仅限于极高的死亡风险患者中。在所有GDT患者亚组中,并发症发生率均降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号