首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Critical Care >Bolus or continuous hydrocortisone – that is the question
【2h】

Bolus or continuous hydrocortisone – that is the question

机译:丸或连续氢化可的松–这就是问题所在

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Constantly evolving treatment guidelines based on a growing body of randomized controlled trials are helping us to improve outcomes in sepsis. However, it must be borne in mind that proven benefit from individual sepsis treatments does not guarantee synergistic beneficial effects when new treatments are added to sepsis management. Indeed, unexpected harmful interactions are also possible. A good example of this is the conflict between intensive insulin therapy and 'low dose' hydrocortisone in septic shock. The goal of tight glycaemic control is made more complicated by steroid-induced hyperglycaemia. In their recent study, Loisa and coworkers demonstrate a measure that reduces the risk for this interaction. They found continuous infusion of hydrocortisone to be associated with fewer hyperglycaemic episodes and reduced staff workload compared with bolus application.
机译:不断发展的基于越来越多的随机对照试验的治疗指南正在帮助我们改善败血症的疗效。但是,必须牢记的是,当将新的治疗方法添加到脓毒症管理中时,从个别的脓毒症治疗中获得的实证收益并不能保证产生协同增效作用。确实,意外的有害相互作用也是可能的。一个很好的例子是败血性休克中强化胰岛素治疗与“低剂量”氢化可的松之间的冲突。类固醇诱导的高血糖使严格控制血糖的目标变得更加复杂。在最近的研究中,Loisa和同事们展示了一种降低这种互动风险的措施。他们发现,与推注相比,连续输注氢化可的松可减少血糖升高,并减轻工作人员的工作量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号