首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Psychiatry >The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depressive and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons
【2h】

The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depressive and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons

机译:心理疗法和药物疗法在治疗抑郁症和焦虑症中的功效:直接比较的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although psychotherapy and antidepressant medication are efficacious in the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders, it is not known whether they are equally efficacious for all types of disorders, and whether all types of psychotherapy and antidepressants are equally efficacious for each disorder. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies in which psychotherapy and antidepressant medication were directly compared in the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders. Systematic searches in bibliographical databases resulted in 67 randomized trials, including 5,993 patients that met inclusion criteria, 40 studies focusing on depressive disorders and 27 focusing on anxiety disorders. The overall effect size indicating the difference between psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy after treatment in all disorders was g=0.02 (95% CI: −0.07 to 0.10), which was not statistically significant. Pharmacotherapy was significantly more efficacious than psychotherapy in dysthymia (g=0.30), and psychotherapy was significantly more efficacious than pharmacotherapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder (g=0.64). Furthermore, pharmacotherapy was significantly more efficacious than non-directive counseling (g=0.33), and psychotherapy was significantly more efficacious than pharmacotherapy with tricyclic antidepressants (g=0.21). These results remained significant when we controlled for other characteristics of the studies in multivariate meta-regression analysis, except for the differential effects in dysthymia, which were no longer statistically significant.
机译:尽管心理疗法和抗抑郁药在抑郁症和焦虑症的治疗中是有效的,但尚不清楚它们是否对所有类型的疾病都同样有效,以及所有类型的心理疗法和抗抑郁药是否对每种疾病都同样有效。我们对研究进行了荟萃分析,其中直接比较了心理疗法和抗抑郁药在治疗抑郁症和焦虑症中的作用。在书目数据库中进行系统搜索得到了67项随机试验,包括5993例符合纳入标准的患者,40项针对抑郁症的研究和27项针对焦虑症的研究。表示所有疾病治疗后心理治疗和药物治疗之间差异的总体效应大小为g = 0.02(95%CI:-0.07至0.10),在统计学上无统计学意义。在心律不齐方面,药物治疗比心理治疗有效(g = 0.30),在强迫症中,心理治疗比药物治疗有效(g = 0.64)。此外,药物治疗比非指导性咨询有效(g = 0.33),心理治疗比三环抗抑郁药有效(g = 0.21)。当我们在多元荟萃回归分析中控制研究的其他特征时,这些结果仍然很有意义,除了在心律不齐方面的差异性影响已不再具有统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号