首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology >DNA methylation patterns in alcoholics and family controls
【2h】

DNA methylation patterns in alcoholics and family controls

机译:酗酒者和家庭控制中的DNA甲基化模式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AIM: To assess whether DNA methylation patterns in chronic alcoholics are different from non-alcoholic sibling controls.METHODS: We examined the methylation patterns in DNA samples from 25 chronic alcoholics and 22 matched siblings as controls (one per family). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and analyzed for differences in the methylation patterns after bisulfite-conversion. We used the Illumina GoldenGate Methylation Cancer Panel I (Illumina, San Diego, CA), which probes the methylation profile at 1505 CpG sites from 807 cancer related genes. We excluded the 84 X-chromosome CpG sites and 134 autosomal CpG sites that failed to show a within sample reliability score of at least 95% for all samples, leaving 1287 autosomal CpG sites (associated with 743 autosomal genes) with reliable signals for all samples. A methylation score was calculated as the average methylation for the 1287 CpG sites examined. Differences were assessed by a two-sample t-test. We also examined the average sib pair differences in methylation scores at each of the 1287 sites. All analyses were performed using SPSS, version 9.0, P < 0.05 was considered significant.RESULTS: Methylation levels at the 1287 CpG sites averaged 28.2% for both alcoholics and controls. The mean difference in methylation scores between alcoholic and non-alcoholic sibs by CpG site was < 1% with small inter-individual variances; and only 5 CpG sites had an average sib difference > 5%. Subgroup analysis showed that methylation scores were significantly lower for the alcoholic-dependent subjects who smoked compared to their non-smoking unaffected siblings. Specifically, among smokers who are alcoholic, global methylation indices were significantly lower than in non-alcoholic sib controls, whereas among non-smoking alcoholics, the global indices were significantly higher (P = 0.008).CONCLUSION: Although we observed no effect of alcoholism alone on DNA methylation, there is a decrease in alcoholics who smoke, suggesting a mechanism for alcohol-tobacco synergy for carcinogenesis.
机译:目的:评估慢性酒精中毒患者的DNA甲基化模式是否与非酒精中毒兄弟姐妹对照不同。方法:我们检查了来自25名慢性酒精中毒者和22名与之匹配的兄弟姐妹(每个家庭一个)的DNA样本中的甲基化模式。从外周血中提取DNA,并分析亚硫酸氢盐转化后甲基化模式的差异。我们使用了Illumina GoldenGate甲基化癌症研究小组I(Illumina,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚州),该研究小组探查了来自807个与癌症相关的基因的1505个CpG位点的甲基化谱。我们排除了84个X染色体CpG位点和134个常染色体CpG位点,这些位点的所有样本均未显示出至少95%的样本内可靠性得分,而剩下1287个常染色体CpG位点(与743个常染色体基因相关)对所有样本均具有可靠的信号。计算甲基化分数作为所检查的1287个CpG位点的平均甲基化。差异通过两次样本t检验进行评估。我们还检查了每个1287个位点的甲基化分数中的平均同胞对差异。所有分析均使用SPSS 9.0版进行,P <0.05被认为是显着的。结果:1287个CpG位点的甲基化水平对于酗酒者和对照组均平均为28.2%。酒精和非酒精同胞之间的CpG位点甲基化得分的平均差异<1%,个体间差异较小;只有5个CpG位点的平均同胞差异> 5%。亚组分析显示,与不吸烟但未受影响的同胞相比,吸烟的酒精依赖受试者的甲基化得分明显较低。具体而言,在酗酒的吸烟者中,总体甲基化指数显着低于非酗酒的同胞对照,而在不吸烟的酗酒者中,总体指数显着更高(P = 0.008)。结论:尽管我们没有观察到酗酒的影响仅靠DNA甲基化,吸烟者中的酗酒者就减少了,这表明了酒精-烟草协同作用致癌的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号