首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Hepatology >Drug and herb induced liver injury: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale for causality assessment
【2h】

Drug and herb induced liver injury: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale for causality assessment

机译:药物和草药引起的肝损伤:国际医学组织理事会因果关系评估量表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Causality assessment of suspected drug induced liver injury (DILI) and herb induced liver injury (HILI) is hampered by the lack of a standardized approach to be used by attending physicians and at various subsequent evaluating levels. The aim of this review was to analyze the suitability of the liver specific Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale as a standard tool for causality assessment in DILI and HILI cases. PubMed database was searched for the following terms: drug induced liver injury; herb induced liver injury; DILI causality assessment; and HILI causality assessment. The strength of the CIOMS lies in its potential as a standardized scale for DILI and HILI causality assessment. Other advantages include its liver specificity and its validation for hepatotoxicity with excellent sensitivity, specificity and predictive validity, based on cases with a positive reexposure test. This scale allows prospective collection of all relevant data required for a valid causality assessment. It does not require expert knowledge in hepatotoxicity and its results may subsequently be refined. Weaknesses of the CIOMS scale include the limited exclusion of alternative causes and qualitatively graded risk factors. In conclusion, CIOMS appears to be suitable as a standard scale for attending physicians, regulatory agencies, expert panels and other scientists to provide a standardized, reproducible causality assessment in suspected DILI and HILI cases, applicable primarily at all assessing levels involved.
机译:由于缺乏标准的方法可供主治医生使用,并且在随后的各种评估水平上,使可疑药物引起的肝损伤(DILI)和草药引起的肝损伤(HILI)的因果关系评估受到阻碍。这篇综述的目的是分析特定于肝脏的国际医学组织国际理事会(CIOMS)量表作为DILI和HILI病例因果关系评估的标准工具的适用性。在PubMed数据库中搜索以下术语:药物性肝损伤;草药引起的肝损伤; DILI因果关系评估;和HILI因果关系评估。 CIOMS的优势在于它有潜力作为DILI和HILI因果关系评估的标准规模。其他优点包括,基于再暴露试验阳性的病例,它的肝特异性和对肝毒性的验证具有出色的敏感性,特异性和预测有效性。该量表允许前瞻性收集有效因果关系评估所需的所有相关数据。它不需要肝毒性方面的专业知识,其结果可随后进行完善。 CIOMS量表的不足之处包括有限地排除了其他原因和定性的风险因素。总而言之,CIOMS似乎适合作为参加医师,监管机构,专家小组和其他科学家的标准量表,以便在可疑的DILI和HILI病例中提供标准化的,可重复的因果关系评估,主要适用于所有涉及的评估级别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号