首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Visualized Surgery >Can a standardised Ventilation Mechanical Test for quantitative intraoperative air leak grading reduce the length of hospital stay after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy?
【2h】

Can a standardised Ventilation Mechanical Test for quantitative intraoperative air leak grading reduce the length of hospital stay after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy?

机译:可以通过定量的术中漏气分级的标准化通气机械测试来减少电视胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术后的住院时间吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We standardised a Ventilation Mechanical Test (VMT) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy that classifies intraoperative alveolar air leaks (IOAALs) in mild, moderate and severe. We assumed that mild IOAALs (<100 mL/min) are self-limiting, whereas severe IOAALs (>400 mL/min) must be treated. An IOAAL between 100 and 400 mL/min was defined moderate and constituted the study population of a prospective multicentre randomised trial on the use of a polymeric biodegradable sealant (ProgelTM Pleural Air Leak Sealant, Bard Davol, USA) in case of moderate IOAAL compared with no treatment. We assumed that the standardised VMT allows to accurately selected patients needing treatment, thus limiting unnecessary sealant use. We analysed data of the randomised trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of Progel treatment in VMT selected patients. This is a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Patients with moderate IOAAL were randomised to Progel (group A) or “no treatment” (group B).The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the postoperative duration of air leakage. The secondary outcome measures included: mean time to chest drain removal, mean length of hospitalisation, the percentage of postoperative complications occurring within two months, and cost of treatment. Between January 2015 and January 2017, 255 VATS lobectomies were performed in 4 centres, 55 met the inclusion criteria, and they were randomly assigned to 2 different groups (28 in the Progel and 27 in the control group). The mean air leakage duration was statistically different between the two groups: in the group A was 1.60 vs. 5.04 days in group B (P<0.001). The average duration of chest drainage was statistically shorter in group A than in the control group (4.1 vs. 6.74 days; P=0.008). The mean time to hospital discharge was also statistically shorter in group A than in group B (5.75 vs. 7.85 days, P=0.026). In the Progel group, a statistically significant reduction of hospitalisation costs compared with the control group was observed (Progel group =12,905₤, Control group =39,690₤; P<0.001). Our standardised VMT helps in reducing the length of hospital stay after VATS lobectomy because in case of IOAALs between 100 and 400 mL/min the use of ProgelTM significantly reduces postoperative air leak, time to drain removal and length of hospitalisation compared with no treatment. This shorter hospital stays results in significant cost saving benefits. Selection of patients with standardised VMT is essential to limit unnecessary intraoperative sealant treatments, thus contributing to limit the costs.
机译:我们对视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术后的机械通气标准(VMT)进行了标准化,该分类对轻度,中度和重度的术中肺泡气漏(IOAAL)进行了分类。我们假设轻度IOAAL(<100 mL / min)是自限性的,而重度IOAAL(> 400 mL / min)必须治疗。 IOAAL为100至400 mL / min,定义为中等水平,构成了一项前瞻性多中心随机试验的研究人群,该试验涉及使用聚合物可生物降解密封剂(Progel TM 胸膜气密性密封剂,美国Bard Davol,美国),如果是中度IOAAL,则不进行治疗。我们假设标准化的VMT可以准确选择需要治疗的患者,从而限制了不必要的密封剂的使用。我们分析了随机试验的数据,以评估Progel治疗在VMT选定患者中的成本效益。这是一项多中心随机对照试验。中度IOAAL患者随机分为Progel(A组)或“不治疗”(B组)。研究的主要疗效终点是术后漏气时间。次要结果指标包括:清除下水道的平均时间,平均住院时间,两个月内发生的术后并发症的百分比以及治疗费用。在2015年1月至2017年1月之间,在4个中心进行了255例VATS肺叶切除术,其中55例符合纳入标准,被随机分为2个不同的组(Progel组为28个,对照组为27个)。两组之间的平均漏气持续时间有统计学差异:A组为1.60天,而B组为5.04天(P <0.001)。 A组的平均胸腔引流持续时间在统计学上比对照组短(4.1天与6.74天; P = 0.008)。在统计学上,A组的平均出院时间也比B组短(5.75天对7.85天,P = 0.026)。与对照组相比,在Progel组中,住院费用的降低具有统计学意义(Progel组= 12,905₤,对照组= 39,690₤; P <0.001)。我们的标准化VMT有助于减少VATS肺叶切除术后的住院时间,因为在IOAALs为100至400 mL / min的情况下,与不进行治疗相比,ProgelTM的使用可显着减少术后漏气,引流时间和住院时间。较短的住院时间可节省大量成本。选择具有标准化VMT的患者对于限制不必要的术中密封剂治疗至关重要,从而有助于降低成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号