首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Jornal Vascular Brasileiro >Tratamento endovascular versus tratamento aberto de aneurisma de artéria poplítea: artigo de revisão
【2h】

Tratamento endovascular versus tratamento aberto de aneurisma de artéria poplítea: artigo de revisão

机译:血管内治疗与开放治疗of动脉瘤:综述文章

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The conventional treatment for a popliteal artery aneurysm is open surgery to exclude the aneurysm and revascularization of the affected limb. Over recent years, endovascular treatment has grown in popularity and has been attracting increased interest. Endovascular treatment is less invasive and associated with lower rates of morbidity, but it is expensive and patency is uncertain. The aim of this review is to compare these two treatments by analyzing the outcomes reported in primary and secondary studies. A narrative review is conducted of the literature published over the last 5 years. Six retrospective studies, two meta-analyses, one clinical trial and one Cochrane systematic review were selected. We were unable to draw firm conclusions because of small patient samples and short follow-up periods. There is no clear evidence to indicate that the outcomes of one or another elective treatment are superior. New randomized trials should be conducted to determine the role endovascular treatment has to play in management of this type of aneurysm.
机译:<!-前鼻-> a动脉动脉瘤的常规治疗是开放手术,以排除动脉瘤和患肢的血运重建。近年来,血管内治疗日益普及,并且引起了越来越多的兴趣。血管内治疗的侵入性较小,并与较低的发病率相关,但费用昂贵且通畅性尚不确定。这篇综述的目的是通过分析主要和次要研究中报告的结果来比较这两种治疗方法。对过去五年中发表的文献进行叙述性回顾。选择了六项回顾性研究,两项荟萃分析,一项临床试验和一项Cochrane系统评价。由于患者样本少且随访时间短,我们无法得出明确的结论。没有明确的证据表明一种或另一种选择性治疗的效果更好。应该进行新的随机试验以确定血管内治疗在这类动脉瘤的治疗中所起的作用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号