首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Growth inhibitory effects of Phyllanthus niruri extracts in combination with cisplatin on cancer cell lines
【2h】

Growth inhibitory effects of Phyllanthus niruri extracts in combination with cisplatin on cancer cell lines

机译:楠木提取物联合顺铂对癌细胞株的生长抑制作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM:To investigate the cytotoxic effects of spray-dried extracts of Phyllanthus niruri in combination with cisplatin on two cancer cell lines.METHODS: Colorectal carcinoma (HT29) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells were treated with spray-dried extracts of Phyllanthus niruri (SDEPN) either alone or in combination with cisplatin at different concentrations (0.5 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL) for 4 h and 24 h. To verify and quantify cancer cells treated with these products as well as identify the cell cycle stage and cell viability, we stained the cells with propidium iodide and assessed them by flow cytometry. The percentage of cells in different cell cycle phases was quantified and data were expressed as histograms. Significant differences between groups were determined using analysis of variance and Bonferroni’s test, as indicated. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.RESULTS: SDEPN had significantly different cytotoxic effects on HT29 (2.81 ± 0.11 vs 3.51 ± 1.13, P > 0.05) and HepG2 (5.07 ± 0.3 vs 15.9 ± 1.04, P < 0.001) cells when compared to control cells for 4 h. SDEPN also had significantly different cytotoxic effects on HT29 (1.91 ± 0.57 vs 4.53 ± 1.22, P > 0.05) and HepG2 (14.56 ± 1.6 vs 35.67 ± 3.94, P < 0.001) cells when compared to control cells for 24 h. Both cell lines were killed by cisplatin in a dose-dependent manner compared to control cells (HepG2 cells for 4 h: 10.78 ± 1.58 vs 53.89 ± 1.53, P < 0.001; 24 h: 8.9 ± 1.43 vs 62.78 ± 1.87, P < 0.001 and HT29 cells for 4 h: 9.52 ± 0.913 vs 49.86 ± 2.89, P < 0.001; 24 h: 11.78 ± 1.05 vs 53.34 ± 2.65, P < 0.001). In HT29 cells, pretreatment with SDEPN and subsequent treatment with cisplatin resulted in a greater number of cells being killed (12.78 ± 1.01 vs 93.76 ± 1.6, P < 0.001). HepG2 cells showed significant cell killing with treatment with SDEPN when combined with cisplatin (12.87 ± 2.78 vs 78.8 ± 3.02, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: SDEPN is selectively toxic against two cancer cell lines. Moreover, SDEPN in combination with cisplatin induces a synergistic increase in the cell death of both HT29 and HepG2 cells.
机译:目的:研究硝化楠木喷雾干燥提取物与顺铂联用对两种癌细胞的杀伤作用。方法:采用硝化楠木喷雾干燥提取物处理结直肠癌(HT29)和人肝癌细胞(HepG2)细胞。 (SDEPN)单独或与不同浓度(0.5 mg / mL和1 mg / mL)的顺铂联合使用4小时和24小时。为了验证和量化用这些产品处理的癌细胞以及鉴定细胞周期阶段和细胞生存力,我们用碘化丙啶对细胞进行了染色,并通过流式细胞术对其进行了评估。量化不同细胞周期阶段中的细胞百分比,并将数据表示为直方图。如所示,使用方差分析和Bonferroni检验确定组之间的显着差异。 P <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:SDEPN对HT29(2.81±0.11 vs 3.51±1.13,P> 0.05)和HepG2(5.07±0.3 vs 15.9±1.04,P <0.001)有明显不同的细胞毒性作用)细胞与对照细胞比较4小时。与24小时的对照细胞相比,SDEPN对HT29(1.91±0.57 vs 4.53±1.22,P> 0.05)和HepG2细胞(14.56±1.6 vs 35.67±3.94,P <0.001)的细胞毒性作用也显着不同。与对照细胞相比,两种细胞系均被顺铂杀死,且呈剂量依赖性(HepG2细胞4 h:10.78±1.58 vs 53.89±1.53,P <0.001; 24 h:8.9±1.43 vs 62.78±1.87,P <0.001和HT29细胞4小时:9.52±0.913 vs 49.86±2.89,P <0.001; 24小时:11.78±1.05 vs 53.34±2.65,P <0.001)。在HT29细胞中,用SDEPN预处理并随后用顺铂处理导致更多的细胞被杀死(12.78±1.01对93.76±1.6,P <0.001)。与顺铂联合使用SDEPN处理后,HepG2细胞显示出明显的细胞杀伤作用(12.87±2.78 vs 78.8±3.02,P <0.001)。结论:SDEPN对两种癌细胞具有选择性毒性。此外,SDEPN与顺铂组合可诱导HT29和HepG2细胞的细胞死亡协同增加。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号