首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Use of albendazole sulfoxide albendazole sulfone and combined solutions as scolicidal agents on hydatid cysts (in vitro study)
【2h】

Use of albendazole sulfoxide albendazole sulfone and combined solutions as scolicidal agents on hydatid cysts (in vitro study)

机译:使用阿苯达唑亚砜阿苯达唑砜和混合溶液作为杀虫剂对hy虫囊肿的作用(体外研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To establish which scolicidal agents are superior and more suitable for regular use.METHODS: Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces were obtained from 25 patients with liver hydatid cysts. Various concentrations of albendazole sulfone, albendazole sulfoxide, and albendazole sulfone and albendazole sulfoxide mixed together in concentrations of 50 μg/mL, and H2O2 in a concentration of 4%, NaCl 20%, and 1.5% cetrimide-0.15% chlorhexidine (10% Savlon-Turkey) were used to determine the scolicidal effects. Albendazole (ABZ) derivatives and other scolicidal agents were applied to a minimum of 100 scoleces for 5 and 10 min. The degree of viability was calculated according to the number of living scolices per field from a total of 100 scolices observed under the microscope.RESULTS: After 5 min, ABZ sulfone was 97.3% effective, ABZ sulfoxide was 98.4% effective, and the combined solution was 98.6% effective. When sulfone, sulfoxide and the combined solutions were compared, the combined solution seemed more effective than sulfone. However, there was no difference when the combined solution was compared with sulfoxide. After 10 min, hypertonic salt water, sulfone, sulfoxide, and the combined solution compared to other solutions looked more effective and this was statistically significant on an advanced level. When sulfone, sulfoxide, and the combined solutions were compared with each other, the combined solution appeared more effective than sulfone. When the combined solution was compared with sulfoxide, there was no difference.CONCLUSION: Despite being active, ABZ metabolites did not provide a marked advantage over 20% hypertonic saline. According to these results, we think creating a newly improved and more active preparation is necessary for hydatid cyst treatment.
机译:目的:确定哪种杀卵剂较优,更适合常规使用。方法:从25例肝包虫囊肿患者中获得细粒棘球pro原菌。各种浓度的阿苯达唑砜,阿苯达唑亚砜,阿苯达唑砜和阿苯达唑亚砜混合在一起,浓度分别为50μg/ mL,H2O2的浓度为4%,NaCl为20%,西曲美奈德-0.15%洗必泰(10%Savlon) -土耳其)用于确定杀伤力。阿苯达唑(ABZ)衍生物和其他杀伤剂在至少100分钟的施行5分钟和10分钟的施涂中。根据显微镜下观察到的总共100个切片的存活分数计算生存力。结果:5分钟后,ABZ砜有效率为97.3%,ABZ亚砜有效率为98.4%,混合溶液有效率为98.6%。当比较砜,亚砜和混合溶液时,混合溶液似乎比砜更有效。但是,将混合溶液与亚砜比较时没有差异。 10分钟后,与其他溶液相比,高渗盐水,砜,亚砜和混合溶液看起来更有效,并且在高级水平上具有统计学意义。比较砜,亚砜和混合溶液时,混合溶液似乎比砜更有效。结论:尽管是活性的,但ABZ代谢物并没有提供超过20%高渗盐水的显着优势。根据这些结果,我们认为创建一种新改良且更有效的制剂对于包虫囊肿治疗是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号