首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Vaccine: X >Oral bait handout as a method to access roaming dogs for rabies vaccination in Goa India: A proof of principle study
【2h】

Oral bait handout as a method to access roaming dogs for rabies vaccination in Goa India: A proof of principle study

机译:印度果阿口服诱饵发放作为向野狗接种狂犬病疫苗的一种方法:一项原理验证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rabies has profound public health, social and economic impacts on developing countries, with an estimated 59,000 annual human rabies deaths globally. Mass dog vaccination is effective at eliminating the disease but remains challenging to achieve in India due to the high proportion of roaming dogs that cannot be readily handled for parenteral vaccination.Two methods for the vaccination of dogs that could not be handled for injection were compared in Goa, India; the oral bait handout (OBH) method, where teams of two travelled by scooter offering dogs an empty oral bait construct, and the catch-vaccinate-release (CVR) method, where teams of seven travel by supply vehicle and use nets to catch dogs for parenteral vaccination. Both groups parenterally vaccinated any dogs that could be held for vaccination.The OBH method was more efficient on human resources, accessing 35 dogs per person per day, compared to 9 dogs per person per day through CVR. OBH accessed 80% of sighted dogs, compared to 63% by CVR teams, with OBH accessing a significantly higher proportion of inaccessible dogs in all land types. All staff reported that they believed OBH would be more successful in accessing dogs for vaccination. Fixed operational team cost of CVR was four times higher than OBH, at 127 USD per day, compared to 34 USD per day. Mean per dog vaccination cost of CVR was 2.53 USD, whilst OBH was 2.29 USD. Extrapolation to a two week India national campaign estimated that 1.1 million staff would be required using CVR, but 293,000 staff would be needed for OBH.OBH was operationally feasible, economical and effective at accessing the free roaming dog population. This study provides evidence for the continued expansion of research into the use of OBH as a supplementary activity to parenteral mass dog vaccination activities in India.
机译:狂犬病对发展中国家具有深远的公共卫生,社会和经济影响,全球估计每年有59,000人死于狂犬病。大规模的犬疫苗接种可以有效地消除这种疾病,但由于漫游狗的比例很高,难以进行肠胃外疫苗接种,因此在印度仍难以实现。在两种方法中,比较了无法注射的两种犬疫苗接种方法。印度果阿;口服诱饵发放(OBH)方法,其中两人组成的团队由踏板车旅行,为狗提供空的口服诱饵构造,以及捕获疫苗释放(CVR)方法,其中七人组成的团队,通过补给车辆旅行并使用网来捉狗进行肠胃外疫苗接种。两组均在胃肠外接种了任何可以进行疫苗接种的狗。OBH方法在人力资源上更有效,每人每天访问35只狗,而通过CVR每人每天访问9只狗。 OBH接待了80%的可见狗,而CVR团队只有63%,在所有土地类型中OBH都接待了更高比例的无法进入的狗。所有工作人员都报告说,他们相信OBH在接种狗疫苗方面会更成功。 CVR的固定运营团队成本是OBH的四倍,每天为127美元,而每天为34美元。 CVR的每只狗平均接种成本为2.53美元,而OBH为2.29美元。外推到为期两周的印度全国运动估计,使用CVR需要110万名工作人员,但是OBH需要293,000名工作人员。OBH在操作上是可行的,经济的并且有效地获得了免费的漫游狗种群。这项研究提供了证据,证明了继续扩大使用OBH作为印度肠胃外大规模狗疫苗接种活动的补充活动的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号