首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Orthopedics >Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain
【2h】

Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain

机译:腰椎ga突关节(小关节)疼痛的治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint interventions in managing chronic low back pain.METHODS: The review process applied systematic evidence-based assessment methodology of controlled trials of diagnostic validity and randomized controlled trials of therapeutic efficacy. Inclusion criteria encompassed all facet joint interventions performed in a controlled fashion. The pain relief of greater than 50% was the outcome measure for diagnostic accuracy assessment of the controlled studies with ability to perform previously painful movements, whereas, for randomized controlled therapeutic efficacy studies, the primary outcome was significant pain relief and the secondary outcome was a positive change in functional status. For the inclusion of the diagnostic controlled studies, all studies must have utilized either placebo controlled facet joint blocks or comparative local anesthetic blocks. In assessing therapeutic interventions, short-term and long-term reliefs were defined as either up to 6 mo or greater than 6 mo of relief. The literature search was extensive utilizing various types of electronic search media including PubMed from 1966 onwards, Cochrane library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, clinicaltrials.gov, along with other sources including previous systematic reviews, non-indexed journals, and abstracts until March 2015. Each manuscript included in the assessment was assessed for methodologic quality or risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist for diagnostic interventions, and Cochrane review criteria and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for therapeutic interventions. Evidence based on the review of the systematic assessment of controlled studies was graded utilizing a modified schema of qualitative evidence with best evidence synthesis, variable from level I to level V.RESULTS: Across all databases, 16 high quality diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. In addition, multiple studies assessed the influence of multiple factors on diagnostic validity. In contrast to diagnostic validity studies, therapeutic efficacy trials were limited to a total of 14 randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of intraarticular injections, facet or zygapophysial joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of the innervation of the facet joints. The evidence for the diagnostic validity of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with at least 75% pain relief with ability to perform previously painful movements was level I, based on a range of level I to V derived from a best evidence synthesis. For therapeutic interventions, the evidence was variable from level II to III, with level II evidence for lumbar facet joint nerve blocks and radiofrequency neurotomy for long-term improvement (greater than 6 mo), and level III evidence for lumbosacral zygapophysial joint injections for short-term improvement only.CONCLUSION: This review provides significant evidence for the diagnostic validity of facet joint nerve blocks, and moderate evidence for therapeutic radiofrequency neurotomy and therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain.
机译:目的:探讨腰椎小关节干预治疗慢性下腰痛的诊断有效性和治疗价值。方法:审查过程采用系统的循证评估方法,用于诊断有效性的对照试验和治疗效果的随机对照试验。纳入标准涵盖以受控方式进行的所有多面关节干预。大于50%的疼痛缓解是用于进行具有先前疼痛运动能力的对照研究的诊断准确性评估的结果指标,而对于随机对照治疗功效研究,主要结果是显着缓解疼痛,其次结果是功能状态发生积极变化。为了包括诊断对照研究,所有研究都必须使用安慰剂对照的小关节阻断剂或比较的局部麻醉剂阻断剂。在评估治疗干预措施时,短期和长期缓解定义为最多6 mo或大于6 mo的缓解。文献搜索广泛使用各种类型的电子搜索媒体,包括从1966年开始的PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,国家指南信息交换所,clinicaltrials.gov,以及其他来源,包括以前的系统评价,未索引期刊和摘要,直至2015年3月。评估中包括的手稿使用诊断干预措施的可靠性研究质量评估清单,Cochrane审查标准和介入性疼痛管理技术-可靠性和偏倚风险质量评估工具进行了方法学质量或偏倚风险评估,用于治疗干预。根据对对照研究的系统评估的证据,使用定性证据的改进方案与最佳证据综合进行分级,分级范围从I级到V级。结果:在所有数据库中,共鉴定出16项高质量的诊断准确性研究。此外,多项研究评估了多种因素对诊断有效性的影响。与诊断有效性研究相反,治疗功效试验仅限于总共14项随机对照试验,评估关节内注射,小关节或突关节神经阻滞的有效性,以及小关节关节神经支配的射频神经切开术。腰椎小关节神经阻滞至少可减轻疼痛75%并具有执行先前疼痛运动能力的诊断有效性的证据是I级,这是根据最佳证据综合得出的I级至V级的范围得出的。对于治疗干预,证据水平从II级到III级不等,II级证据表明腰椎小关节神经阻滞和射频神经切开术可长期改善(大于6 mo),III级证据表明腰s骨zy关节联合注射较短结论:本评价为小关节神经阻滞的诊断有效性提供了重要证据,并为治疗射频下颌骨切开术和小关节神经阻滞在治疗慢性下背痛方面提供了适度证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号