首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine >Genomics and Proteomics Issue: Making a New Technology Work: The Standardization and Regulation of Microarrays
【2h】

Genomics and Proteomics Issue: Making a New Technology Work: The Standardization and Regulation of Microarrays

机译:基因组学和蛋白质组学问题:开展新技术工作:微阵列的标准化和规范

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The translation of laboratory innovations into clinical tools is dependent upon the development of regulatory arrangements designed to ensure that the new technology will be used reliably and consistently. A case study of a key post-genomic technology, gene chips or microarrays, exemplifies this claim. The number of microarray publications and patents has increased exponentially during the last decade and diagnostic microarray tests already are making their way into the clinic. Yet starting in the mid-1990s, scientific journals were overrun with criticism concerning the ambiguities involved in interpreting most of the assumptions of a microarray experiment. Questions concerning platform comparability and statistical calculations were and continue to be raised, in spite of the emergence by 2001 of an initial set of standards concerning several components of a microarray experiment. This article probes the history and ongoing efforts aimed at turning microarray experimentation into a viable, meaningful, and consensual technology by focusing on two related elements:1) The history of the development of the Microarray Gene Expression Data Society (MGED), a remarkable bottom-up initiative that brings together different kinds of specialists from academic, commercial, and hybrid settings to produce, maintain, and update microarray standards; and2) The unusual mix of skills and expertise involved in the development and use of microarrays. The production, accumulation, storage, and mining of microarray data remain multi-skilled endeavors bridging together different types of scientists who embody a diversity of scientific traditions. Beyond standardization, the interfacing of these different skills has become a key issue for further development of the field.
机译:将实验室创新转化为临床工具取决于监管安排的发展,旨在确保可靠,一致地使用新技术。对关键的后基因组技术,基因芯片或微阵列的案例研究证明了这一主张。在过去十年中,微阵列出版物和专利的数量呈指数增长,诊断性微阵列测试已进入临床。然而,从1990年代中期开始,科学杂志就受到批评,因为人们对解释微阵列实验的大多数假设所含的歧义表示不满。尽管到2001年出现了有关微阵列实验几个组成部分的初始标准,但有关平台可比性和统计计算的问题仍在继续提出。本文通过关注以下两个相关方面,探讨了旨在将微阵列实验变成可行,有意义和共识的技术的历史和正在进行的努力:1)微阵列基因表达数据学会(MGED)的发展历史,这是一个了不起的底部倡议将来自学术,商业和混合环境的不同类型的专家召集在一起,以产生,维护和更新微阵列标准; (2)与开发和使用微阵列有关的技能和专门知识的不同寻常的混合。微阵列数据的生产,积累,存储和挖掘仍然是多技能的努力,将体现了多种科学传统的不同类型的科学家联系在一起。除了标准化以外,这些不同技能的接口已成为该领域进一步发展的关键问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号