首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Psychiatry >Testing frameworks for personalizing bipolar disorder
【2h】

Testing frameworks for personalizing bipolar disorder

机译:个性化躁郁症的测试框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The hallmark of bipolar disorder is a clinical course of recurrent manic and depressive symptoms of varying severity and duration. Mathematical modeling of bipolar disorder holds the promise of an ability to personalize diagnoses, to predict future mood episodes, to directly compare diverse datasets, and to link basic mechanisms to behavioral data. Several modeling frameworks have been proposed for bipolar disorder, which represent competing hypothesis about the basic framework of the disorder. Here, we test these hypotheses with self-report assessments of mania and depression symptoms from 178 bipolar patients followed prospectively for 4 or more years. Statistical analysis of the data did not support the hypotheses that mood arises from a rhythmic process or multiple stable states (e.g., mania or depression) or that manic and depressive symptoms are highly anti-correlated. Alternatively, it is shown that bipolar disorder could arise from an inability for mood to quickly return to normal when perturbed. This latter concept is embodied by an affective instability model that can be personalized to the clinical course of any individual with chronic disorders that have an affective component.
机译:躁郁症的标志是反复发作的躁狂和抑郁症状的临床过程,其严重程度和持续时间各不相同。双相情感障碍的数学建模有望实现个性化诊断,预测未来的情绪发作,直接比较各种数据集以及将基本机制与行为数据联系起来。已经提出了双相情感障碍的几种建模框架,它们代表了有关该疾病基本框架的相互竞争的假设。在这里,我们通过对178名躁郁症患者进行了为期4年或更长时间的躁狂和抑郁症状自我报告评估来检验这些假设。数据的统计分析不支持以下假设:情绪源自节奏性过程或多种稳定状态(例如躁狂或抑郁),或躁狂和抑郁症状高度反相关。另外,表明躁郁症可能是由于情绪紊乱而无法迅速恢复正常而引起的。后一种概念由情感不稳定性模型体现,该模型可以针对具有情感成分的任何慢性疾病个体的临床过程进行个性化设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号