首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Psychiatry >Adversity-induced relapse of fear: neural mechanisms and implications for relapse prevention from a study on experimentally induced return-of-fear following fear conditioning and extinction
【2h】

Adversity-induced relapse of fear: neural mechanisms and implications for relapse prevention from a study on experimentally induced return-of-fear following fear conditioning and extinction

机译:逆境诱发的恐惧复发:通过对恐惧引起的恐惧和条件消退进行实验性恐惧回归研究的神经机制及其对预防复发的意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The efficacy of current treatments for anxiety disorders is limited by high relapse rates. Relapse of anxiety disorders and addiction can be triggered by exposure to life adversity, but the underlying mechanisms remain unexplored. Seventy-six healthy adults were a priori selected for the presence or absence of adverse experiences during childhood (CA) and recent past (RA; that is, past 12 months). Participants underwent fear conditioning (day 1) and fear extinction and experimental return-of-fear (ROF) induction through reinstatement (a model for adversity-induced relapse; day 2). Ratings, autonomic (skin conductance response) and neuronal activation measures (functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)) were acquired. Individuals exposed to RA showed a generalized (that is, not CS− specific) fear recall and ROF, whereas unexposed individuals showed differential (that is, CS+ specific) fear recall and ROF on an autonomic level despite no group differences during fear acquisition and extinction learning. These group differences in ROF were accompanied by corresponding activation differences in brain areas known to be involved in fear processing and differentiability/generalization of ROF (that is, hippocampus). In addition, dimensional measures of RA, CA and lifetime adversity were negatively correlated with differential skin conductance responses (SCRs) during ROF and hippocampal activation. As discriminating signals of danger and safety, as well as a tendency for overgeneralization, are core features in clinically anxious populations, these deficits may specifically contribute to relapse risk following exposure to adversity, in particular to recent adversity. Hence, our results may provide first and novel insights into the possible mechanisms mediating enhanced relapse risk following exposure to (recent) adversity, which may guide the development of effective pre- and intervention programs.
机译:当前治疗焦虑症的功效受到高复发率的限制。暴露于生活逆境可以引发焦虑症和成瘾的复发,但其潜在机制尚待探索。优先选择76名健康成人,原因是他们在儿童时期(CA)和最近的过去(RA;即过去12个月)是否存在不良经历。参与者进行了恐惧调节(第1天),并通过恢复(恐惧症引起的复发的模型;第2天)消除了恐惧,并进行了实验性恐惧归来(ROF)诱导。获得评分,自主性(皮肤电导反应)和神经元激活指标(功能性磁共振成像(fMRI))。暴露于RA的个体表现出普遍的(即不是CS-特异性的)恐惧回忆和ROF,而未暴露的个体在自主水平上表现出差异性(即CS +特异性)的恐惧回忆和ROF,尽管在恐惧获得和消退过程中没有群体差异。学习。 ROF的这些群体差异伴随着大脑区域相应的激活差异,而大脑区域已知参与恐惧过程和ROF(即海马体)的分化/泛化。此外,在ROF和海马激活过程中,RA,CA和终生逆境的尺寸度量与差异皮肤电导反应(SCR)呈负相关。由于危险和安全的区分信号以及过度概括的趋势是临床焦虑人群的核心特征,因此这些缺陷可能特别是在遭受逆境(尤其是近期逆境)后导致复发风险。因此,我们的研究结果可能会提供新颖的见解,揭示可能的机制在介导(最近)逆境后介导增加的复发风险,这可能指导有效的预防和干预计划的制定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号