首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Tobacco Control >Tobacco policy rating form: a tool for evaluating worksite and tribal smoking control policies
【2h】

Tobacco policy rating form: a tool for evaluating worksite and tribal smoking control policies

机译:烟草政策评级表:评估工作场所和部落吸烟控制政策的工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To report on the development and validation of a rating scale to code the various components of written tobacco policies. DESIGN: A one-page Tobacco Policy Rating Form (TPRF) was developed to apply to written policies in both worksites and American Indian tribes. Fifteen worksite and 24 tribal tobacco policies from a diverse set of companies and tribes of varying size and economic status were rated on the TPRF by two separate sets of experienced and inexperienced raters. Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) was computed to measure inter- rater agreement. RESULTS: The scale was found to produce a high level of agreement when used by both experienced and inexperienced raters on both tribal and worksite policies. For experienced raters, W = 0.92, P < 0.0001 for tribal policies and W = 0.97, P < 0.0001 for worksite policies; for inexperienced raters, W = 0.89, P < 0.0001 for tribal policies and W = 0.96, P < 0.0001 for worksite policies. CONCLUSIONS: The TPRF seems worthy of future use as a tool to rate the strength and comprehensiveness of written tobacco policies. It may be extended to other settings such as schools and municipalities, or used by investigators studying behavioural or economic consequences of smoking policies. Those interested in policy change may find the TPRF useful as a way of describing existing policies and as a quantitative measure of change.


机译:目的:报告制定和验证用于编写书面烟草政策各个组成部分的等级量表的报告。设计:开发了一页纸的烟草政策评级表(TPRF),以应用于工作场所和美洲印第安人部落的书面政策。 TPRF由两组经验丰富和经验不足的评估者对TPRF进行了评估,评估了来自不同公司和部落的15个工作场所和24个部落烟草政策,这些部落的规模和经济状况不同。计算Kendall的一致性系数(W),以衡量评估者之间的一致性。结果:当经验丰富和经验不足的评估者在部落和工作场所政策上都使用该量表时,可以产生很高的一致性。对于经验丰富的评估者,部落政策的W = 0.92,P <0.0001;工作场所政策的W = 0.97,P <0.0001;对于没有经验的评估者,部落政策的W = 0.89,P <0.0001,工作场所政策的W = 0.96,P <0.0001。结论:TPRF似乎值得将来用作评价书面烟草政策的力度和全面性的工具。它可以扩展到其他环境,例如学校和市政当局,或者由研究吸烟者的行为或经济后果的研究人员使用。那些对政策变更感兴趣的人可能会发现TPRF可以用作描述现有政策和量化变更的手段。


著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号